Paradox of Autonomy: explaining flaws in South American security regionalism

Paradoxo da Autonomia: explicando as deficiências no regionalismo de segurança sul-americano

Resumo

This article addresses the South American difficulties in the consolidation of regional security mechanisms, developing an analytical model called the “paradox of autonomy.” This model was developed through the application of inductive and deductive methodological criteria, based on the observation of recent historical reality, in order to attain generalizable lessons from a relevant case for South American international relations. Also using rational analytical approaches that allow their construction within the framework of rational action problems. From the observation on the emergence and performance of the South American Defense Council, it was identified that the allowing conditions for a novel mechanism of regional (collective) autonomy for security, paradoxically offered opportunities for the exercise of national (individual) autonomy. The article concludes that, although the conditions for the paradox of autonomy are difficult to overcome in cases of security regionalism initiatives, there are possibilities to do so. The key would be in less ambitious institutional designs that recognize the inherent difficulties for institutional regional security cooperation in South America.

Biografia do Autor

Víctor M. Mijares, Universidad de Los Andes, Colombia
Assistant Professor of International Relations, Department of Political Science, Universidad de Los Andes, Colombia.

Referências

Adler, E., and Greve, P. (2009). “When security community meets balance of power: overlapping regional mechanisms of security governance.” Review of International Studies 35 (2009): 59-84.

Ayoob, M. “Inequality and theorizing in international relations: the case for subaltern realism.” International Studies Review 4, no. 3: 27-48.

Baracaldo Orjuela, D., and Chenou, J. M. (2018). “Regionalism and presidential ideology in the current wave of Latin American integration.” International Area Studies Review 22, no. 1: 41-63.

Battaglino, J. M. “The coexistence of peace and conflict in South America: toward a new conceptualization of types of peace.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 55, no. 2 (2012): 131-151.

Boersner, D. Relaciones Internacionales de América Latina: breve historia. México: Editorial Nueva Imagen. 1982.

Briceño-Ruiz, J. and Simonoff, A. (eds). Integración y cooperación regional en América Latina. Una relectura a partir de la teoría de la autonomía. Buenos Aires: Biblos. 2015.

Briceño-Ruiz, J., and Morales, I. (eds). Post-Hegemonic Regionalism in the Americas: Toward a Pacific–Atlantic Divide? New York: Routledge. 2017.

Burges, S. W. “Brazil as regional leader: Meeting the Chávez challenge.” Current History 109 no. 724 (2010): 53-59.

Buzan, B., and Wæver, O. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2003.

Clapham, C. “Sovereignty and the Third World state.” Political Studies 47, no. 3, (1999): 522-537.

Dominguez, J. I. Boundary Disputes in Latin America. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace. 2003.

Flemes, D., and Wehner, L. “Drivers of Strategic Contestation: The case of South America.” International Politics 52, no. 2 (2015): 163-177.

Franchi, T., Migon, E. X. F. G., and Jiménez Villarreal, R. X. (2017). “Taxonomy of interstate conflicts: is South America a peaceful region?” Brazilian Political Science Review 11, no. 2: e0008.

Gardini, G. L., and Lambert, P. (eds). Latin American Foreign Policies: Between Ideology and Pragmatism. Palgrave Macmillan: New York. 2011.

Guerra, F.-X. Modernidad e independencias: ensayos sobre las revoluciones hispánicas. Madrid: Encuentro. 2011.

Hardin, G. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research 1, no. 3, (2009): 243-253.

Herz, J. H. “Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma.” World Politics 2, no. 2 (1950): 157-180.

IISS. “The Military Balance 2019.” The International Institute for Strategic Studies, February 15, 2019. Accessed March 20, 2019. https://www.iiss.org/en/publications/military-s-balance

Jaguaribe, H. “Autonomía periférica y autonomía céntrica.” Estudios Internacionales 12, no. 46 (1979): 91-130.

Jervis, R. “Cooperation under the security dilemma.” World politics 30, no. 2 (1978): 167-214.

Katzenstein, P. J. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 2015.

Kelly, R. E. “Security theory in the ‘new regionalism.’” International Studies Review 9, no. 2, (2007): 197-229.

Krasner, S. D. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1999.

Lake, D. A. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 2009.

Lake, D. A., and Morgan, P. Regional Orders. Building Security in a New World. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press. 2010.

Lemke, D. “Dimensions of Hard Power: Regional Leadership and Material Capabilities.” In Flemes, D. (ed). Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers. Farnham: Ashgate. 2010.

Malamud, A. “A leader without followers? The growing divergence between the regional and global performance of Brazilian foreign policy.” Latin American Politics and Society 53, no. 3 (2011): 1-24.

Mansfield, E. D. “Concentration, polarity, and the distribution of power.” International Studies Quarterly 37, no. 1 (1993): 105-128.

Mares, D. R. Violent Peace: Militarized Interstate Bargaining in Latin America. New York: Columbia University Press. 2001.

Martín, F. Militarist Peace in South America: Conditions for War and Peace. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2006.

Mearsheimer, J. J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton and Company. 2001.

Mijares, V. M. (2011) “Consejo de Defensa Suramericano: obstáculos para una alianza operativa.” Politeia 34, no. 46 (2011): 1-46.

Mijares, V. M. “Performance of the South American Defense Council under Autonomy Pressures.” Latin American Policy 9, no. 2 (2018): 258-281.

Mijares, V. M., and Nolte, D. “Regionalismo posthegemónico en crisis. ¿Por qué la Unasur se desintegra?” Foreign Affairs Latinoamérica 18, no. 3 (2018): 105-112.

Morgenthau, H. J. Politics Among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace. McGraw-Hill Education: New York. 2005.

Nolte, D. (2010). “How to compare regional powers: analytical concepts and research topics.” Review of International Studies 36, no. 4 (2010): 881-901.

Nweihed, K. G. Frontera y límite en su marco mundial: una aproximación a la fronterología. Caracas: Equinoccio. 1992.

Olson, M. Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1965.

Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2015.

Pressman, J. Warring friends: Alliance restraint in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 2008.

Puig, J. C. “Integración y autonomía de América Latina en las postrimerías del siglo XX.” Integración Latinoamericana 11, no. 109 (1986): 40-62.

Rathbun, B. C. “Uncertain about Uncertainty: Clarifying a Crucial Concept for International Relations Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 51, no. 3 (2007): 271-299.

Riggirozzi, P., and Tussie, D. The Rise of Post-hegemonic Regionalism. The Case of Latin America. New York: Springer. 2012.

Rivarola Puntigliano, A. and Briceño-Ruiz, J. Resilience of Regionalism in Latin America and the Caribbean: Development and Autonomy. Palgrave Macmillan: New York. 2013.

Russell, R., and Tokatlian, J. G. “De la autonomía antagónica a la autonomía relacional: una mirada teórica desde el Cono Sur.” Perfiles Latinoamericanos 10, no. 21 (2002): 159-194.

Russell, R., and Tokatlian, J. G. “América Latina y su gran estrategia: entre la aquiescencia y la autonomía.” Revista Cidob d'Afers Internacionals 104, (2013): 157-180.

Sanahuja, J. A. (2009). “Del regionalismo abierto al regionalismo post-liberal. Crisis y cambio en la integración regional en América Latina.” Anuario de la Integración Regional de América Latina y el Gran Caribe 7, (2009): 12-54.

Schenoni, L. L., and Escudé, C. “Peripheral Realism Revisited.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 59, no. 1 (2016): e002.

Schweller, R. L. “Neoclassical realism and state mobilization: expansionist ideology in the age of mass politics.” In Lobell, S. E., Ripsman, N. M., and Taliaferro, J. W. (eds). Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. London: Cambridge University Press, 251-279. 2009.

SIPRI. (2019). “Military Expenditure Database.” Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, February 15, 2019. Accessed March 20, 2019. https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex

Snyder, G. H. Alliance Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1997.

Söderbaum, F. Rethinking Regionalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 2016.

Solingen, E., and Malnight, J. “Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Regionalism.” In Börzel, T. A., and Risse, T. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 64-86. 2016.

Taliaferro, J. W. “State Building for Future Wars: Neoclassical Realism and the Resource-Extractive State.” Security Studies 15, no. 16, (2006): 464-495.

Teixeira, C. G. P. Brazil, the United States, and the South American Subsystem: Regional Politics and the Absent Empire. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. 2012.

Thies, C. G. “The construction of a Latin American interstate culture of rivalry.” International Interactions 34, no. 3 (2008): 231-257.

Tickner, A. (2008). “Colombia y Estados Unidos: una relación ‘especial’”. Foreign Affairs Latinaomérica 8, no. 4 (2008): 65-72.

Van Klaveren, A. “América Latina: hacia un regionalismo abierto.” Estudios Internacionales 30, no. 117 (1997): 62-78.

Vieira, M. A., and Alden, C. “India, Brazil, and South Africa (IBSA): South-South cooperation and the paradox of regional leadership.” Global Governance 17, no. 4 (2011): 507-528.

Wohlforth, W. C. “The Stability of a Unipolar World.” International Security 24, no. 1 (1999): 5-41.

Zacher, M. W. “The territorial integrity norm: International boundaries and the use of force.” International Organization 55, no. 2 (2001): 215-250.

Publicado
24-04-2020
Como Citar
Mijares, V. M. (2020). Paradox of Autonomy: explaining flaws in South American security regionalism. Estudos Internacionais: Revista De relações Internacionais Da PUC Minas, 8(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2020v8n1p89-106