2.
In Lebanon, sectarianism has been a
historically shaped framework dating
back to the Ottoman era. During this
period, religious communities, predo-
minantly Christian and Muslim, started
being treated as distinct and opposing
sociopolitical entities. Following the
attainment of Independence from France
in 1943 and the establishment of the
National Pact, sectarianism became
entrenched in the political landscape
through the implementation of the
consociational model, known as con-
fessionalism. This system involved the
distribution of power among politicians
from 18 officially recognized religious
communities (Makdisi 2000; Cammett,
2014).
delineates a distinction between revolutionary situations and revolutio-
nary outcomes. The former involves the political crisis context triggered
by the influence of a specific opposition movement, posing a challenge
to state power. On the other hand, the latter encompasses the successful
transfer of power to revolutionary actors (Tilly, 1978, p.190-193).
Tilly’s theory provides an intriguing framework for analyzing the
Lebanese context, particularly in light of the protests that have unfolded
in the country since 2011. During this period, an opposition movement
emerged, mobilizing new waves of protests in 2013, 2015, and culmina-
ting in its peak in 2019. Despite the fact that none of these episodes of po-
pular mobilization resulted in a complete transfer of power, the editors of
“Lebanon Uprisings of 2019” interpret these occurrences as revolutionary
situations due to their impact on Lebanese politics and society. Notably,
the work acknowledges that these revolutionary situations are not isola-
ted incidents; instead, their interconnected agendas reveal a deliberate re-
jection of Lebanon’s existing political system and economic model. This
repetition of agendas signifies an ongoing revolutionary process within
the country.
After the introductory theoretical discussion, the book shifts its fo-
cus to a second theme, exploring the recent historical context that has
shaped the development of opposition movements and the mobilization
of social protests since the Arab Sping. Given that the Lebanese
revolutionary pro- cess is essentially an anti-system struggle, the
chapters dedicated to this topic are crucial. They provide a historical
narrative, examining both political and economic aspects, to delineate
the features of the system that protesters aspire to dismantle.
Within the political domain, the authors explore the configuration
of sectarianism, constitutionally acknowledged as confessionalism2. Since
the country’s independence, this model has resulted in the establishment
of a sectarian elite that consolidates control over state resources and dis-
tributes them within their network of clients. As a result, a segment of
the population is deprived of basic rights. On the economic aspect, the
authors highlight the adoption of neoliberalism from the 1990s onward.
This economic framework, stressing decreased state regulation and limi-
ted social intervention, has sparked a succession of protests since its ini-
tiation (Baumann, 2016). Notably, amid the escalating crisis in 2019, dissa-
tisfaction with neoliberalism surged to unprecedented levels, serving as a
catalyst for the eruption of Thawra.
Continuing on this contextual theme, the book provides a notewor-
thy contribution to the study of revolutions by introducing the concept of
“neoliberal sectarianism,” as elucidated by Rima Majed in her examina-
tion of the political-economic landscape in both Lebanon and Iraq. Majed
emphasizes that neoliberal sectarianism is not merely a combination of
the sectarian political system and the neoliberal capitalist model; rather,
it emerges as a phenomenon constructed at the intersection of these two
forces. The author contends that, in the absence of state provisions for
social welfare and redistribution, coupled with the deregulation of labor
relations under neoliberalism, sectarian elites position themselves as the
exclusive alternative for certain sectors of society seeking security and