7
Daniela Vieira Secches, Fabiano P. Mielniczuk Special Issue – Contemporary Russia in Internaonal Relaons – Introducon
Special Issue – Contemporary Russia in
International Relations – Introduction
Dossiê – Rússia Contemporânea nas Relações
Internacionais – Introdução
Dossier – Rusia Contemporánea en las Relaciones
Internacionales – Introducción
Daniela Vieira Secches1
Fabiano P. Mielniczuk2
Recebido em: 12 de julho de 2024
Aprovado em: 05 de agosto de 2024
DOI: 10.5752/P.2317-773X.2023v11n2p7-10
The Russian launching of the Special Military Operation (SMO) in
Ukraine in February 2022 brought Russia back to the agenda of interna-
tional politics. Due to the unprecedented nature of what was instantly
called a “full scale invasion” or a “war of aggression” by NATO allies, the
irrelevance conferred to Russia in the last decades gave place to a promi-
nent role in world aairs. Like it or not, it seems that Russias continental
size, abundant wealth in natural resources, military prowess and long
history as a diplomatic broker are once again making the headlines of
mainstream media and lling the pages of specialized journals world-wi-
de. This is the context of this special issue of Estudos Internacionais.
After the end of the USSR, President Boris Yeltsin and his minis-
ter of foreign aairs, Andrei Kozyrev, strove to assure the international
society that Russia had a western lineage. All in all, Russia adopted hu-
man rights discourse, defended the advantages of multilateralism, and
reassured members of the “global community” that free markets were
needed to guarantee political freedom. The leaders even armed that
the communist period was a gap in the Soviet countries’ history of learn-
ing with the West.
Nonetheless, in spite of these eorts, Russia’s conciliatory discourse
was not recognized by the West. The Western State’s lack of political will
to solve Russia’s economic problems and continuing worries about the
country’s military revival ensured that the self-image Russia was trying
to sell about herself was not convincing. The consequent lack of sup-
port for Russias leaders resulted in social animosity against the West.
Neocommunists and ultranationalists, both political groups with clear
1. Professor at the Graduate Program
in International Relations of Pontifical
Catholic University of Minas Gerais
(PUC Minas), Belo Horizonte – Brazil.
PhD in International Relations (PUC Mi-
nas). MA in Political Sciences (Masaryk
University, Czechia). BA in International
Relations (PUC Minas). BA in Law (Fede-
ral University of Minas Gerais).
2. Professor at the Graduate Program
in International Strategic Studies of the
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
(UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil. Doctor in
International Relations by the Institute
of International Relations (Pontifical
Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro).
He is a research member at NEBRICS/
UFRGS.
8
estudos internacionais • Belo Horizonte, ISSN 2317-773X, v. 11, n. 3, (out. 2023), p. 7-10
anti-western platforms, gained popular appeal. This fact forced Yeltsin
to shift Russia’s foreign policy. To maintain the support of Russias con-
stituents, the country’s foreign policy in the near abroad became more
assertive. This tendency was then reinforced by Yevgeny Primakov in the
mid 1990’s, and has persisted in Russian foreign policy since then, even
despite the short honeymoon between presidents Putin and Bush after
September 11th. Russias confrontation with Georgia, in 2008, and the lat-
er annexation of Crimea in 2014 appears to only conrm this tendency.
The “emulation-confrontation” dichotomous relationship with the
West needs to be qualied. Domestically, Russia passes through a process
of consolidating an alternative statehood project in the new millennium.
Its signicant economic growth in the early 2000s, driven by oil and gas
dividends, and the arrival of Vladimir Putin to power served as the start-
ing point for a series of reforms. The growth of the Russian economy
enabled relevant social policies at the beginning of Putins government,
leveraging his popular support. In the scope of security and defense, the
country focused its eorts on modernizing its military arsenal, with spe-
cial attention to oensive nuclear capabilities considering the deconstruc-
tion of the international nuclear deterrence architecture initiated by the
United States of America (USA) in the late 1990s. The security agenda
also served as a space for national reconciliation in resolving the situa-
tion in Chechnya and for promoting the concentration of powers in the
central government in the face of the terrorist threat, especially after the
Beslan attacks in 2004.
At the international level, the 21st century witnesses an interna-
tional order under various pressures. Experiencing crises related to pol-
itics, security, economics, health and environment, contemporary inter-
national politics challenges the eld of International Relations when it de-
bates polarity, continuity and change. While US hegemony is undergoing
undeniable deterioration, Chinas economic projection still does not seem
to be a sucient element for Beijing to take its place as the sole pole in the
international system, nor does China show interest in proposing its own
version of an order in total opposition to the liberal project articulated by
the West in the 20th century.
The current international scenario complexity can be exemplied
in the escalation of the Ukrainian crisis in 2022. Politically, the centrali-
ty of the Eastern Ukrainian territory for Russian international insertion
through access to a year-round navigable sea materializes traditional dy-
namics of dispute for power-generating capabilities. Moreover, the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) expansion into Eastern Europe
and the deconstruction of the nuclear deterrence architecture are ele-
ments strongly present in the Russian narrative about the escalation in
2022 and reect pressures on the distribution of power in the internation-
al order. The strategic partnership between Russia and China in recent
years also illustrates pressures for potential changes in the international
order and is a central element in relativizing the Kremlin’s isolation. The
trajectory of this friendship qualied by Vladimir Putin and by Xi Jinping
as limitless also reects deeper revisionist tendencies in the face of the
deterioration of US hegemony.
9
Daniela Vieira Secches, Fabiano P. Mielniczuk Special Issue – Contemporary Russia in Internaonal Relaons – Introducon
Furthermore, the worsening of the Ukrainian crisis demonstrated
eects of international economic integration that had not been felt until
then, at least of this magnitude and character. Sanctions on Russia and
their impact on the availability and price of a range of products shook
markets around the world, especially in the early months of the conict.
In the medium and long term, it is observed that the Russian-Ukrainian
conict contributes to accelerating deglobalization movements already
underway in the context of the economic-nancial crisis of 2008 and the
2020 Covid-19 pandemics. Added to this, the demand for a more robust
international cooperation on climate change may also be impacted by
the cleavages fostered in the context of the escalation of tensions and the
imposition of international sanctions.
Therefore, it is worth noting that today’s International Relations
scholars face a world full of paradoxes. On the one hand, we have never
lived in a world in which information about international politics was
so available and easily accessible. On the other, the plurality of sources
and the manipulation of information place specialists in a dicult posi-
tion to study phenomena whose nature is marked by the diverse politi-
cal-ideological interests that constitute them. Hence, the special edition
Contemporary Russia in International Relations aims to promote a qualied
debate on the place occupied by Russia internationally. We do not wish
to start here by defending the possibility of neutral scientic production.
However, diversifying academic production on such a complex topic can
bring to the fore relevant contributions produced from dierent perspec-
tives. In this sense, mobilizing scholars from the Global South to present
their views on contemporary Russia may advance alternative perspec-
tives on the current crisis.
This special edition invited authors to incorporate two dimensions
in their contributions: (1) Russian interests in light of the Kremlin’s con-
temporary foreign policy; and (2) the context of escalating tensions in
the Ukrainian crisis, in 2022. The three articles that were approved for
publication share a common concern with empirical analysis and the
treatment of data based on primary sources. They also support their
arguments through literature reviews that consider not only the argu-
ments of Western specialists, but also those of scholars belonging to other
geographic spaces like the Global South. Regarding the theoretical and
methodological foundation of the texts presented here, pluralism marks
the constitution of pragmatic research designs, suitable for dealing with
the complex and multifaceted phenomenon that this edition intends to
problematize.
The relations between Russia and Asia are the central theme of
the contribution Sino-Russian Energy Cooperation in the Post-Cold War (2000-
2021), written by Brazilian researchers Fernanda Albuquerque, Alexandre
César Cunha Leite and Cristina Carvalho Pacheco. In their piece, they
focus on the Sino-Russian relations from the energy production dimen-
sion. Energy is taken as the cornerstone of relations between Moscow
and Beijing, which are deepening in a context in which both Russia and
China need greater diversication of their trading partners in this eld.
After analyzing the possibilities and challenges that these partners face in
10
estudos internacionais • Belo Horizonte, ISSN 2317-773X, v. 11, n. 3, (out. 2023), p. 7-10
this sector, they suggest that these ties will last based on the reaching of
long-term agreements and the construction of a support infrastructure
for joint exploration and import of energetic resources.
Rafael Contreras-Luna and Natthanan Kunnamas address cen-
tral elements for understanding Russias international insertion in the
contemporary international order in the article Recalibrating Moscow’s
Strategies in Asia: Russia and Southeast Asia in a Multipolar World. The au-
thors investigate the Asian turn of Russian foreign policy with a focus
on its rapprochement not only with China, but, especially, with other
Southeast Asian powers. In doing so, the article is premised on the multi-
polar reality of the contemporary international order and problematizes
the Russian position as a great power based on its increasingly strategic
appropriation of the Asian world. According to the authors, the Kremlin
still lacks a more comprehensive and well-established strategy in relation
to the powers of Southeast Asia so that it can implement its reorientation
towards the continent as a stage for its global projection.
The third article, entitled The international political economy of the
agrifood question in Russia, reects on the agenda of agricultural produc-
tion. Food production presents itself as an important constitutive capa-
bility for state power at the international level, as can be seen from the
impact that the escalation of tensions in 2022 generated on the grain and
fertilizer markets, for example. Fabiano Escher, researcher aliated with
the Graduate Program in Social Sciences in Development, Agriculture
and Society (CPDA), at the Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro
(UFRRJ), analyzes topics such as agribusiness, family farming, food se-
curity and geopolitics from statistical data and qualied bibliographical
review on Russian agri-food production.
The special edition Contemporary Russia in International Relations
fullls, then, its objective of expanding the perspective on Russian in-
ternational insertion in the scholarship of International Relations, in-
volving researchers from the Global South in problematizing the topic.
Furthermore, by focusing on relations with Asia, this edition of Revista
Estudos Internacionais discusses an extremely relevant sphere within
the scope of Russias foreign policy, which is relatively little explored by
mainstream literature that tends to mostly oppose the Kremlin’s actions
from a western centric perspective.