The acquisition of tense and aspect: Evidence from Portuguese and Spanish
Resumo
This paper seeks to understand how the categories tense and aspect are represented in the mental grammars of typically-developing children. Past work has found that English- and French-learning children as old as 6 years of age often use tense marking to convey aspect, conflating the two categories. In contrast, young Spanish speakers appear to treat the two categories as distinct by age 3. We confirm that native learners of Spanish dissociate tense and aspect by 3 years of age and suggest that they may even do so as early as 2;5 or before. We find similar results in Portuguese. We further demonstrate, in line with past work, that the use of aspect marking at this young age might be driven, in part, by differences in lexical telicity.
Downloads
Referências
BLOOM, L., LIFTER, K., & HAFITZ, J. Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language. Language, 56(2), 1980. 386-412.
BRONCKART, J. P., & Sinclair, H. Time, tense, and aspect. Cognition, 2(1), 107-130.
CHOMSKY, N. Aspects of theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1965.
CHOMSKY, N. Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 1972.
CHOMSKY, N. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. 1981.
CHOMSKY, N. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1995.
COMRIE, B. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1976.
EMONDS, J. A transformation approach to syntax. New York: Academic Press. 1976.
HALLE, M., & Marantz, A. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K.Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20 (pp. 111-176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1993.
HERMONT, A. B., & MORATO, R. A. Aquisição de tempo e aspecto em condições normais e no déficit específico de linguagem. Revista Linguí∫tica, 10(1), pp. 213-233. 2014.
HODGSON, M. Children’s production and comprehension of Spanish grammatical aspect. In R. S. Gess & E. J. Rubin (Eds.), Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Romance Linguistics (pp. 125-144). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 2004.
MARKMAN, E. M., & Wachtel, G. F. Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 1988. 121-157.
POLLOCK, J.-Y. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(3), 1989. 365-425.
SCHÜTZE, C., & Wexler, K. Subject case licensing and English root infinitives. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahan-Amitay, E. Hughes, & A. Zukowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 670-681). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. 1996.
VINNITSKAYA, I., & Wexler, K. The role of pragmatics in the development of Russian aspect. First Language, 21, 2001. 143-186.
XAVIER, G. O estudo do aspecto em uma perspectiva minimalista: Representação sintática e relações com as categorias funcionais e lexicais. Tese (Doutorado). Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte. 2016.
WEXLER, K. Optional infinitives, head movement, and the economy of derivations. In D. Lightfoot & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Verb Movement (pp. 305-350). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1994.
WEXLER, K. Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106, 23-79. 1998.
The author detains permission for reproduction of unpublished material or with reserved copyright and assumes the responsibility to answer for the reproduction rights.
Português
English
