Unnatural London: the Metaphor and the Marvelous in China Mieville's Perdido Street Station
Resumo
This paper explores allegorical and unnatural elements in China Miéville’s novel Perdido Street Station, starting with a parallel between the fictional city New Crobuzon and London. Fantasy literature examines human nature by means of myth and archetype and science fiction exploits the same aspects, although emphasizing technological possibilities. Horror is said to explore human nature plunging into our deepest fears. We encounter the three elements profusely in the narrative, making it a dense fictional exercise. In postclassical narratology, unnatural narratives are understood as mimetical exercises questioning verisimilitude in the level of the story and of discourse. When considered unnatural, narratives have a broader scope, sometimes even transcending this mimetical limitation. Fantastical and marvelous elements generally strike us as bizarre and question the standards that govern the real world around us. Although Fantasy worlds do also mirror the world we live in, they allow us the opportunity to confront the model when physically or logically impossible characters or scenes enhance the reader’s imagination. Elements of the fantastic and the marvelous relate to metaphor as a figure of speech and can help us explore characters’ archetypical functions, relating these allegorical symbols to the polis. In Miéville’s narrative, such characters will be paralleled to inhabitants of London in different temporal and spatial contexts, enhancing how the novel metaphorically represents the city as an elaborate narrative strategy.
Downloads
Referências
BIEDERMANN, Hans. Dictionary of Symbolism: Cultural Icons and the Meanings Behind
Them. Trans. James Hulbert. New York: Facts on File, 1992
CHEVALIER, Jean and Alain Gheerbrant. The Penguin Dictionary of Symbols. Trans. John
Buchanan-Brown. London: Penguin, 1996
DAUENHAUER, Bernard, PELLAUER, David. “Paul Ricoeur”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta ed., 2011
KIPLING, Rudyard. 1990. Something of Myself, and Other Autobiographical Writings. ed.
Thomas Pinney. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1990
LAUSBERG, H. Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study Leiden: Brill,
MABILLE, Pierre. Le merveilleux. Saint Clément de rivière : Fata Morgana, 1992
MIÉVILLE, China. Iron Council. London: Del Rey, 2004
MIÉVILLE, China. Perdido Street Station. London: Del Rey, 2000
MIÉVILLE, China. The Scar. London: Del Rey, 2002
RELPH, Edward. Place and Placelessness. Chicago: Pion Ltda, 1976
RENARD, Maurice. 1994. On the Scientific-Marvellous Novel. Trans. Arthur B. Evans
Science Fiction Studies. (397 405http://scholarship.depauw.edu/mlang_facpubs/21/)
RICHARDSON, Brian. Unnatural Narrative: Theory, History, and Practice. Columbus: Ohio
State UP, 2015
RICOEUR, Paul. The Rule of Metaphor. Multidisciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in
Language.Transaltion by Robert Czerny. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008
SEAMON, David. Key Texts of Human Geography. Los Angeles: Sage, 2008
SPIVAK, Gayatri Chakravorty. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: toward a history of the
vanishing present. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999
TODOROV, Tvetan. The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to Literary Genre. 3rd ed. Ithaca:
Cornell UP, 1975.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
O envio de qualquer colaboração implica, automaticamente, a cessão integral dos direitos autorais à PUC Minas. Solicita-se aos autores assegurarem:
- a inexistência de conflito de interesses (relações entre autores, empresas/instituições ou indivíduos com interesse no tema abordado pelo artigo), e
- órgãos ou instituições financiadoras da pesquisa que deu origem ao artigo.
- todos os trabalhos submetidos estarão automaticamente inscritos sob uma licença creative commons do tipo "by-nc-nd/4.0".