O papel subestimado do interlocutor na abordagem cognitiva da metáfora

Ulrike Schröder

doi:10.5752/P.2358-3428.2014v18n34p217

Ulrike Schröder Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2358-3428.2014v18n34p217

Palavras-chave: Teoria da Metáfora Conceitual, Interlocutor, Compreensão, Comunicação, Interação.

Resumo

Uma das maiores críticas voltadas para a Teoria da Metáfora Conceitual é que Lakoff e Johnson (2003, 1999) partem de uma constelação idealizada de interlocutores, de modo que o processo da compreensão de uma metáfora simplesmente se dá por meio da ativação de metáforas conceptuais, entrincheiradas no cérebro dos participantes (GIBBS, 2007). Procurar-se-á investigar quais as abordagens que dirigem sua atenção ao ouvinte como parte ativa por coconstruir o significado particular da expressão metafórica em dependência do contexto pragmático, social e cultural em que os interlocutores estão inseridos. A questão central é até que ponto os estudos existentes conseguem reintegrar o processo holístico da comunicação, e, para tal, distinguimos entre três linhas de pesquisa a serem aprofundadas: estudos psicolinguísticos, textual-discursivos e pragmático-interacionais.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

BECKMANN, Susanne. Die Grammatik der Metapher. Eine

gebrauchstheoretische Untersuchung des metaphorischen Sprechens. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 2001.

BÜHLER, Karl. Sprachtheorie: die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Fischer, 1982. Original publicado em 1934.

CAMERON, Lynne. Identifying and describing metaphor in spoken discourse data. In: CAMERON, Lynne; LOW, Graham (Ed.). Researching and applying metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. p. 105-132.

CHARTERIS-BLACK, Jonathan; ENNIS, Timothy. A comparative study of metaphor in Spanish and English financial reporting. English for specific purposes, v. 20, p. 249-266, 2001.

GIBBS, Raymond W. Jr. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

GIBBS, Raymond W. Jr. Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In: GIBBS, Raymond W. Jr.; STEEN, Gerard J. Metaphor in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1999. p. 145-166.

GIBBS, Raymond W. Jr. Why Cognitive Linguists Should Care More About Empirical Methods. In: EVANS, Vyvyan; BERGEN, Benjamin; ZINKEN, Jörg (Ed.). The cognitive linguistics reader. London: Equinox Publishing, 2007. p. 40-56.

GIBBS, Raymond W. Jr.; O’BRIAN, Jennifer. Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation for idiomatic meaning. Cognition, 36, 1990. p. 35-64.

GIORA, Rachel. On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.

GRICE, Herbert P. Logic and conversation. In: COLE, Peter; MORGAN, Jery L. Syntax and semantics. New York: Academic Press, 1975. p. 41-58.

GUMPERZ, John. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

HEIDEGGER, Martin. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1957. Original publicado em 1927.

HOFFMAN, Robert R.; KEMPER, Susan. What could reaction-time studies be telling us about metaphor comprehension? Metaphor and symbolic activity, v. 2, p. 149-186, 1987.

HOFSTEDE, Geert. National Culture in Four Dimensions. A Research Based Theory of Cultural Differences among Nations. International studies of management and organization, v. 13, p. 46-74, 1983.

HÜLZER-VOGT, Heike. Kippfigur Metapher – metaphernbedingte

Kommunikationskonflikte in Gesprächen. Ein Beitrag zur empirischen Kommunikationsforschung. Band 1: Gesprächsanalyse. Münster: Nodus Publikationen, 1991.

HUSSERL, Edmund. Logische Untersuchungen. Band 2, Zweiter Teil: Elemente einer phänomenologischen Aufklärung der Erkenntnis. Halle: Max Niemeyer, 1921. Original publicado em 1901.

LAKOFF, George; JOHNSON, Mark. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003. Original publicado em 1980.

LAKOFF, George; JOHNSON, Mark. Philosophy in the flesh. The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999.

LITTLEMORE, Jeannette. The Effect of Cultural Background on Metaphor Interpretation. Metaphor and symbol, v. 18, n. 4, p. 273-288, 2003.

NAYAK, Nandini P.; GIBBS, Raymond W. Jr. Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: general, v. 119, p. 315-330, 1990.

SCHMITZ, Heinrich Walter. Über kommunikative und extrakommunikative Betrachtungsweisen. In: KRALLMANN, Dieter; SCHMITZ, Heinrich Walter. Perspektiven einer Kommunikationswissenschaft. Münster: Nodus Publikationen, 1998. p. 315-326.

SCHMITZ, Heinrich Walter. Die Einheit des kommunikativen Ereignisses. In: RICHTER, Helmut; SCHMITZ, Heinrich Walter. Kommunikation – ein Schlüsselbegriff der Humanwissenschaften? Münster: Nodus Publikationen, 2003. p. 197-206.

SCHRÖDER, Ulrike. Trinta Anos da Teoria Conceptual da Metáfora: uma Retrospectiva Crítica. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos, v. 53, p. 59-71, 2011.

SCHRÖDER, Ulrike . Kommunikationstheoretische Fragestellungen in der kognitiven Metaphernforschung. Eine Betrachtung von ihren Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 2012.

SEARLE, John R. Metaphor. In: ORTONY, Andrew. Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Original publicado em 1979.

SPERBER, Dan; WILSON, Deirdre. Pragmatics, modularity, and mind-reading. Mind & Language, v. 17, p. 3-23, 2002.

SPERBER, Dan; WILSON, Deirdre. A Deflationary Account of Metaphors. In: GIBBS, Raymond W. Jr. The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 84-105.

STEEN, Gerard J. Understanding metaphor in literature: An empirical approach. London: Longman, 1994.

STEEN, Gerard J. Can discourse properties of metaphor affect metaphor recognition? Journal of Pragmatics, v. 36, p. 1.295-1.313, 2004.

STEEN, Gerard J. Finding metaphor in grammar and usage. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2007.

TENDHAL, Markus; GIBBS, Raymond W. Jr. Complementary Perspective on Metaphor: Cognitive Linguistics and Relevance Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, v. 40, p. 1.823-1.864, 2008.

UNGEHEUER, Gerold. Kommunikative und extrakommunikative

Betrachtungsweisen in der Phonetik. In: UNGEHEUER, Gerold. Sprache und Kommunikation. Herausgegeben von Karin Kolb und Heinrich Walter Schmitz. Münster: Nodus Publikationen, 2004. p. 22-34. Original publicado em 1972.

UNGEHEUER, Gerold. Was heißt ‚Verständigung durch Sprechen‘? In: UNGEHEUER, Gerold. Kommunikationstheoretische Schriften I: Sprechen, Mitteilen, Verstehen. Herausgegeben von Johann G. Juchem. Aachen: Rader Publikationen, 1987. p. 34-69.

WEGENER, Philipp. Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen des Sprachlebens. Wiederherausgegeben von Konrad Koerner. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1991. Original publicado em 1885.

ZANOTTO, Mara Sophia; PALMA, Dieli Vesaro. Opening Pandora’s box: Multiple readings of ‘a metaphor’. In: ZANOTTO, Mara Sophia; CAMERON, Lynne; CAVALCANTI, Marilda C. Confronting metaphor in use. An applied linguistic approach. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2008. p. 11-43.