Environmental securitization in International Politics:

an analysis of political leadership’ discourses in the context of the Paris Agreement

Autores

  • Victor de Matos Nascimento Pontifícia Universidade de Minas Gerais

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1809-6182.2024v21n1p2-11

Palavras-chave:

Environment, Climate Change, Securitization, Discourses, Paris Agreement

Resumo

Considering the relationship between environmental problems and international security, this paper questions whether there has been, in recent years, a movement by political leaderships to securitize environmental problems? The methodology applied in this paper was a bibliographical review on securitization and its relationship with environmental discussions. Then, we proceed with a discourse analysis of important political leaderships in the context of the birth of the Paris Agreement. As a result, we observed that, academically, the debate on the environment and security still lacks many studies. And, although it is not possible to affirm that there is a movement of securitization on the part of international political leaderships, in the context of COP-21 there were important speeches associating environmental problems with an urgent threat to the future of humanity.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Victor de Matos Nascimento, Pontifícia Universidade de Minas Gerais

Doutorando em Relações Internacionais pela PUC Minas

Referências

Allenby, Braden R. 2000. Environmental security: concept and implementation. International Political Science Review, 21 (1): 5–21.

Buzan, B.; Waever, O.; Wlde, J. 1998. Security: a New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers: London.

Carter, Timothy R.; Benzie, Magnus; Campiglio, Emanuele; Carlsen, Henrik; Fronzed, Stefan; Hildén, Mikael; Reyer, Christopher P.O.; West, Chris. 2021. A conceptual framework for cross-border impacts of climate change. Global Environmental Change. Vol. 69, p. 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102307.

Clean Power Plan. 2015. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Available at: https://archive.epa.gov/epa/cleanpowerplan/fact-sheet-overview-clean-power-plan.html. Last accessed: July 17, 2021.

Deudney, D. 1990. The Case Against Linking Environmental Degradation and Security. Millennium. Vol. 19, Nº. 3, 46-76.

Foucaut, Michel. 2008. A arqueologia do saber. 7ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária.

Franchini, Matías; Viola, Eduardo; Barros-Platiau, Ana Flávia. 2017. The challenges of the antropocene: from international environmental politics to global governance. Ambiente & Sociedade, vol.20 no.3. São Paulo July/Sept. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2017000300177&lng=en&tlng=en. Last accessed: July 23, 2021.

Francisco, Papa. 2015. Carta Encíclica “Laudato Si’” sobre o cuidado da casa comum. Tradução da Editora do Vaticano. São Paulo: Paulus/ Loyola.

García, Dorde Cuvardic. 2004. La metáfora en el discurso político. Revista Reflexiones. 83 (2), p. 61-72.

Greenpeace Reaction to US Climate Offer. 2015. Greenpeace. Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/news/greenpeace-reaction-to-us-climate-offer/. Last accessed: July 17, 2021.

Hough, Peter. Environmental Security. In. Hough, Peter; Malik, Shahin; Moran, Andrew; Pilbeam, Bruce. 2015. International Security Studies: Theory and practice. Peter Hough, Shahin Malik, Andrew Moran and Bruce Pilbeam (Ed). Routledge: New York.

IMCCS (International Military Council on Climate and Security). 2021. The World Climate and Security Report 2021. Available at: https://imccs.org/the-world-climate-and-security-report-2021/. Last accessed: July 14, 2021.

Maingueneau, Dominique. 2003. Términos Clave del Análisis del Discurso. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Visión.

Malik, Shahin. Constructing Security. In. Houh, Peter; Malik, Shahin; Moran, Andrew; Pilbeam, Bruce. 2015. International Security Studies: Theory and practice. Peter Hough, Shahin Malik, Andrew Moran and Bruce Pilbeam (Ed). Routledge: New York.

Mendes, Cristiano; Dos Santos, Letícia Britto; De Souza, Matilde. 2020. Climate Change, vulnerability and securitization. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 63 (1), e14, p. 3-16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202000114.

Mitchell. Ronald B. International Politics and the Environment. London: SAGE Publications, 2010.

Mussalim, Fernanda. Análise de discurso. In: Mussalim, F.; Bentes, A. C. (orgs.). 2006. Introdução à linguística: domínios e fronteiras, vol.2. 5ª Ed. São Paulo: Cortez.

Remarks by the President on Climate Change. 2013. The White House. Available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/06/25/remarks-president-climate-change. Last accessed: January 13, 2021.

Santos, Letícia Britto dos. 2015. Climate Change as Environmental International Security Issue: The Threat of Global Warming in Small Island States. Conjuntura Internacional, V. 12, Nº. 1, p. 28 - 35.

Silveira, Mariana Balau. 2019. Das negociações do clima ao clima das negociações: A presidência das COP no Complexo de Regime das Mudanças do Clima. Tese (Doutorado em Relações Internacionais) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2019.

The Nobel Peace Prize 2007. 2020. The Nobel Prize. Available at: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/2007/summary/. Last accessed: July 17, 2021.

Underdal, A. Methods of Analysis. In: Miles, E., Underdal, A., Andersen, S., Wettestad, J., Skjaerseth, J., Carlin, E. Environmental Regimes Effectiveness: Confronting Theory and Evidence. MIT Press. 2002.

U.S.-China joint presidential statement on climate change. 2015. The White House. Available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/09/25/us-china-joint-presidential-statement-climate-change. Last accessed: July 17, 2021.

Wallace-Wells, David. 2019. A Terra Inabitável: uma história do futuro. 1ª ed. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

Wettestad, J. Designing Effective Environmental Regimes: the key conditions. EE Publishing. 1999.

Publicado

2025-03-15

Como Citar

Nascimento, V. de M. (2025). Environmental securitization in International Politics: : an analysis of political leadership’ discourses in the context of the Paris Agreement. Conjuntura Internacional, 21(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1809-6182.2024v21n1p2-11

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)