Triangulación y Selectividad. ¿Por qué los Países Intermedios hacen Cooperación Sur-Sur? Un estudio exploratorio desde el caso latinoamericano en Haití

Authors

  • Bernabé Malacalza CONICET / National University of Quilmes, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1809-6182.2016v13n2p44

Keywords:

South-South Cooperation, Intermediate Countries, Foreign Policy

Abstract

El artículo analiza las motivaciones de la Cooperación Sur-Sur de los “países intermedios” en los casos de Brasil, Venezuela, Argentina, México, Chile y Colombia en Haití durante el período 2005-2015, considerando y comparando las correlaciones entre política exterior, concepciones de desarrollo y Cooperación Sur-Sur. La hipótesis es que la CSS cambia a lo largo del tiempo en función de las distintas matrices de triangulación y selectividad que promueven los países

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Bernabé Malacalza, CONICET / National University of Quilmes, Argentina

Bernabé Malacalza holds a PhD in Social Sciences (Latin American Faculty of Social Sciences, FLACSO), a Master in International Economic Relations (University of Barcelona, Spain) and a Master in International Relations and Negotiations (University of San Andrés and FLACSO).
He is currently Assistant Researcher at National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Argentina, based at National University of Quilmes (UNQ), Argentina. He is Main Professor of Thesis Workshop at Ph.D. in Economic Development, UNQ; Main Professor of International Cooperation at Master in International Cooperation, National University of San Martin (UNSAM); and Main Professor of Foreign Policy and International Cooperation at PhD in International Relations, University of Salvador (USAL). Email: b.malacalza@conicet.gov.ar

References

ALMEIDA, Paulo Roberto. A grande fragmentação na América Latina: globalizados, reticentes e bolivarianos. Carta Internacional, 2014, vol. 9, no 1, p. 79-93.

ALTMANN, Josette; ARAVENA, Francisco Rojas. Las paradojas de la integración en América Latina y el Caribe. Siglo XXI, 2008.

BISCHOFF, Paul-Henri. External and domestic sources of foreign policy ambiguity: South African foreign policy and the projection of pluralist middle power. Politikon, 2003, vol. 30, no 1, p. 183-201.

CHASE, Robert S.; HILL, Emily B.; KENNEDY, Paul. Pivotal states and US strategy. FOREIGN AFFAIRS-NEW YORK-, 1996, vol. 75, p. 33-51.

CLAXTON, Brooke. The Place of Canada in Post-War Organization. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 1944, vol. 10, no 04, p. 409-421.

FLEMES, Daniel. O Brasil na iniciativa BRIC: soft balancing numa ordem global em mudança. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 2010, vol. 53, no 1, p. 141-156.

GLAZEBROOK, G. DeT. The middle powers in the United Nations system. International Organization, 1947, vol. 1, no 02, p. 307-318.

HIRST, Mónica. América Latina y la Cooperación Sur–Sur: reflexiones conceptuales y políticas. En La Cooperación Sur–Sur en Latinoamérica: utopía y realidad, Los libros de la Catarata/IUDC-UCM, 2010, p. 17-39.

HOLBRAAD, Carsten. The role of middle powers. Cooperation and Conflict, 1971, vol. 6, no 1, p. 77-90.

HOLBRAAD, Carsten. Middle powers in the international system. Nueva York: St. Martin's Press, 1984.

HUELSZ, Cornelia. Middle power theories and emerging powers in international political economy: A case study of Brazil. PhD Thesis. University of Manchester, 2009.

HURRELL, Andrew. Hegemony, liberalism and global order: what space for would‐be great powers? International Affairs, 2006, vol. 82, no 1, p. 1-19.

JONES, Rodney W.; HILDRETH, Steven. Emerging powers: defense and security in the third world. 1986.

KEOHANE, Robert O. After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press, 2005.

LIMA, María Regina S. Brasil como país intermedio: imprecisión conceptual y dilemas políticos. Tokatlián, Juan (comp.), India, Brasil y Sudáfrica. El impacto de las nuevas potencias regionales, Buenos Aires, Libros del Zorzal, 2007, p. 169-190

LUMSDAINE, David Halloran. Moral vision in international politics: the foreign aid regime, 1949-1989. Princeton University Press, 1993.

MALACALZA, Bernabé. Unidad y dispersión. Balance de una década de Cooperación Sur-Sur Latinoamericana en Haití. Revista Especial en conmemoración del Premio Iberoamericana a la Investigación en Cooperación Sur-Sur y Triangular, Madrid, SEGIB, 2016.

MELISSEN, Jan. The new public diplomacy: Between theory and practice. En The new public diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2005. p. 3-27.

MILANI, Carlos R. S.; BARAN, Katarzyna; BRAS, Hugo. Brazil’s development cooperation in Haiti since 2010: actor, interests and outcomes. Final Report. Five years after earthquake in Haiti: lessons from South-South Cooperation (the cases of Brazil, Chile and Mexico). CEPAL-Instituto Mora, 2016.

MORGENTHAU, Hans. A Political Theory of Foreign Aid. American Political Science Review, 1962, vol. 56, no 02, p. 301-309.

NEL, Philip. Redistribution and recognition: what emerging regional powers want. Review of International Studies, 2010, vol. 36, no 04, p. 951-974.

NOLTE, Detlef. Potencias regionales: conceptos y enfoques de análisis. El Debate Político. Revista Iberoamericana de Análisis Político, 2007, p. 6-7.

NOLTE, Detlef. How to compare regional powers: analytical concepts and research topics. Review of International Studies, 2010, vol. 36, no 04, p. 881-901.

POTTER, Evan H. Niche diplomacy as Canadian foreign policy. International Journal, 1996, vol. 52, no 1, p. 25-38.

RYERSON, Christie; DEWITT, David. Middle powers and regional security. En Conference ‘Emergent Powers and Regional Security: The experience of IBSA (India, Brazil, South Africa)’, Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires. 2006.

SANTANDER CAMPOS, Guillermo. Identidades e intereses en la cooperación Sur-Sur. Los casos de Chile, Venezuela y Brasil. Madrid: Catarata, 2016.

SCHOEMAN, Maxi. South Africa as an emerging middle power. African Security Review, 2000, vol. 9, no 3, p. 47-58.

SOGGE, David. Dar y tomar. ¿Qué sucede con la ayuda internacional? Barcelona: Icaria, 2002.

VAN DER VEEN, Maurits. Ideas, interests and foreign aid. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

YIN, Robert K. Applications of case study research. Applied social research methods series. London and New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1993.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-16

How to Cite

Malacalza, B. (2016). Triangulación y Selectividad. ¿Por qué los Países Intermedios hacen Cooperación Sur-Sur? Un estudio exploratorio desde el caso latinoamericano en Haití. Conjuntura Internacional, 13(2), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1809-6182.2016v13n2p44

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2016): CONJUNTURA INTERNACIONAL

Section

DOSSIÊ

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a.Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).