Mudança na Dinâmica do Regime Internacional de Mudança Climática Pós-Kyoto

  • Sofia Ladeira Teixeira de Salles Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
  • Mariana Balau Silveira
Palavras-chave: Choque de Instituições, Mudanças Climáticas, Regimes Internacionais, Protocolo de Kyoto, Acordo de Paris

Resumo

O presente trabalho tem como objetivo analisar as diferenças entre dois documentos centrais para a governança ambiental global: o Protocolo de Kyoto, que esteve em vigor durante boa parte dos anos 2000, e o Acordo de Paris, aprovado em 2015. A ideia é compreender em quais aspectos a transição de um tratado para o outro levou à alteração na dinâmica do Regime Internacional de Mudança do Clima (RIMC).

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

ALDERSON, K; HURREL, A. Bull’s conception of international society. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.

BARROS-PLATIAU, Ana Flávia; VARELLA, Marcelo Dias; SCHEICHER, Rafael T. Meio ambiente e relações internacionais: perspectivas teóricas, respostas institucionais e novas dimensões de debate. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, v.47, n.2, p.100-130, dez. 2004.

BERGER, Peter; LUCKMANN, Thomas. A construção social da realidade: tratado de sociologia do conhecimento. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1966.

BIERSTEKER, Thomas J.; WEBER, Cynthia. State sovereignty as social construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

BOBBIO, Norberto; MATEUCCI, Nicola; PASQUINO, Gianfranco. Dicionário de política. Brasília: Editora UnB, 1983.

BOOTH, Wayne C.; COLOMB, Gregory G.; WILLIAMS, Joseph M. A arte da pesquisa. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2000; Brasília: Ed. Universidade de Brasília, 1992. Verbetes: Poder; Política.

BULL, Hedley. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. New York: Columbia University, 1977.

BUZAN, Barry. The primary institutions of international society. In: From international to world society?: English school theory and the social structure of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

CAMBRIDGE DICTIONARY. Enforcement. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 14 jun. 2021.

DUFFIELD, John. What are international institutions?. Oxford: International Studies Review, v. 9, n.1, p. 1-22, primavera 2007.

FINNEMORE, Martha. Norms, culture and world politics: insights from sociology's institucionalism. In: International Organization, v. 50, n. 2, p. 325-347, primavera, 1996.

FINNEMORE, Martha; SIKKINK, Kathryn. Taking Stock: The constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, n. 4, p. 391-416, 2001.

FRANCHINI, Matías; VIOLA, Eduardo; BARROS-PLATIAU, Ana Flávia. The challenges of the antropocene: from international environmental politics to global governance. Ambiente & Sociedade, São Paulo, v. 20, n. 3, p. 2017. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 17 ago. 2020.
FRASER, Trudy. A comparative architectural analysis of the 1997 Kyoto protocol and the 2015 Paris agreement and other ways to counter environmental ‘ratification fatigue’. In: POPOVSKI, Vesselin (ed.). The implementation of the Paris agreement on climate change. [S. l.]: Routledge, 2019.

GERSEN, Jacob E.; POSNER, Eric A. Soft law: lessons from congressional practice. Stanford Law Review, Stanford, v. 61, n. 3, p. 573-627, dez. 2008.

GIDDENS, Anthony. The construction of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.

GIDDENS, Anthony. The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011.

GOODFELLOW, Tom; LINDERMANN, Stefan. The clash of institutions: traditional authority, conflict and the failure of “hybridity” in buganda. In: Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, v.51, n.10, p. 3-26, jan. 2013.

GUZZINI, Stefeno. Constructivism and the role of institutions in international relations, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Peace Research Institute, 2003.

HAGGARD, Stephan; SIMMONS Beth. Theories of international regimes. In: International Organization. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987.

HALL, Rodney Bruce. National collective identity: social constructs and international systems. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999.

HARRE, Rom. Social being. Oxford: Blackwell, 1978.

HASENCLEVER, Andreas; MAYER, Peter; RITTBERGER, Volker. Theories of international regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

IPCC. Summary for policymakers, 2018. In.: masson-delmotte, v.; p. Zhai, h.-o. Pörtner, d. Roberts, j. Skea, p.r. Shukla, a. Pirani, w. Moufouma-kia, c. Péan, r. Pidcock, s. Connors, j.b.r. Matthews, y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. GOMIS, E. LONNOY, T. MAYCOCK, M. TIGNOR, and T. WATERFIELD (eds.). Global Warming of 1.5 C: An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. In Press. 2018. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 19 set. 2020.

IPCC, 2021: Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. contribution of working group i to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Masson Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J. B. R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. In Press.

JAMES, Alan. The practice of sovereign statehood in contemporary international society, Political Studies, v.47, n.3, p. 457-73, 1999.

KEOHANE, Robert O. The demand for international regimes. International Organization, v. 36, n. 2, p. 325-355, primavera, 1982.

KEOHANE, Robert. After hegemony: cooperation and discord in a world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.

KEOHANE, Robert. International institutions: two approaches. International studies quarterly. International Studies Quarterly, v.32, n.4, p.379-396, 1988.

KEOHANE, Robert O.; VICTOR, David G. The regime complex for climate change. The Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements, p. 10-33, Jan. 2010.

KOLBERT, E. The woman who could stop climate change. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 9 nov. 2021.

KOREMENOS, Barbara; LIPSON, Charles; SNIDAL, Duncan. The rational design of international institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Cap. 1
KRASNER, Stephen. Structural cause and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables. In: International Organization, 1982.

KRASNER, Stephen. Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.

KULOVESI, Kati. Exploring the Landscape of climate law and scholarship: two emerging trends. In: HOLLO, Erkki J.; KULOVESI, Kati; MEHLING, Michael (ed.). Climate change and the law. [S. l.]: Springer, 2013. cap. 3, p. 31-62.

MAGUIRE, Rowena. Foundations of international climate law: objectives, principles and methods. In: HOLLO, Erkki J.; KULOVESI, Kati; MEHLING, Michael (ed.). Climate Change and the Law. [S. l.]: Springer. cap. 5, p. 83-111, 2013.

MARCH, James G.; OLSON, Johan P. The institutional dynamics of international political orders, International Organization, v. 52, n. 4, p. 943-969, 1998.

MARCH, James G.; OLSON Johan P. Elaborating the “new institutionalism”. In: Political institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

MAYALL, James. World politics: progress and its limits, Cambridge: Polity, 2000.
MCCORMICK, John. Rumo ao paraíso: a história do movimento ambientalista. Rio de Janeiro: Relumé-Dumará, 1992.

MILLER, Seumas. Social institutions. In: The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University, 2019.

MOOSMANN, Lorenz et al. International climate change negotiations: issues at stake in view of the COP 25 UN Climate Change Conference in Madrid. European Parliament. November, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_STU(2019)642344. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2021.

POPOVSKI, Vesselin. ‘Hard’ and ‘soft’ law on climate change: comparing the 1997 Kyoto Protocol with the 2015 Paris Agreement. In: POPOVSKI, Vesselin (ed.). The implementation of the Paris agreement on climate change. [S. l.]: Routledge, 2019.

POPOVSKI, Vesselin. Implementation of international environmental agreements. In: POPOVSKI, Vesselin (ed.). The implementation of the Paris agreement on climate change. [S. l.]: Routledge, 2019.

PROLO, Caroline. O que falta para o acordo de Paris funcionar?. Observatório do Clima, 13 nov. 2018. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 6 out. 2020.

TURNER, Jonathan. The institutional order. New York: Longman, 1997.
UNFCCC. Kyoto protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on climate change, 1997. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 8 jun. 2021.

UNFCCC. Paris agreement, 2015. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 8 jun. 2021.

UNFCCC. United Nations framework convention on climate change, 1992. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 8 jun. 2021.

VIOLA, Eduardo. O regime internacional de mudança climática e o Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, v. 17, n. 50, p. 25-46, out. 2002.

WEIDNER, Helmut. O desenvolvimento de capacidades em política ambiental: resultados de um Estudo em 30 países. In: HOFMEISTER, Wilhelm (ed.). Rio + 10 = Joanesburgo: rumos ao desenvolvimento sustentável. Fortaleza: Fundação Konrad Adenauer, 2002. p. 65-97.

YOUNG, Oran R. International regimes: problems of concept formation. World Politics, 1980.

YOUNG, Oran R. Regime dynamics: the rise and fall of international regimes. International Organization, University of Wisconsin Press, v. 36, ed. 2, p. 277-297, 1982. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 15 abr. 2021.

YOUNG, Oran R. International cooperation: building regimes for natural resources and the environment. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989.
Publicado
27-04-2024
Como Citar
Salles, S. L. T. de, & Silveira, M. B. (2024). Mudança na Dinâmica do Regime Internacional de Mudança Climática Pós-Kyoto. Conjuntura Internacional, 19(3), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1809-6182.2022v19n3p5-11