NATURE, CULTURE AND THE ONTOLOGICAL TURN – DIALOGIES
Keywords:
Nature. Culture. Society. Ontological turn.Abstract
It is intended to present the results of a scientific initiation research project, which aimed to investigate how the relationship between the terms nature and culture and or nature and society occurs in three post-structuralist theories: the symmetric anthropology of Bruno Latour, Filippe Descola's anthropology of nature and Eduardo Viveiros de Castro's perspective. Highlighting the context of the ontological turn in the theoretical production of Anthropology as a starting point to understand the shift in focus from the epistemological discussion - which asks for the conditions of possibility of knowledge - to an opening to new ontologies, we sought to stand out in each selected theory, central aspects that help to understand how the authors work with the concepts mentioned above. The methodology used was a theoretical and conceptual investigation of bibliographic production, of an exploratory nature, with the analytical categories "nature" and "culture / society" as a guide. Priority was given to studying a specific work by each selected author, namely, respectively, in Latour, Reagregando o Social - an introduction to Actor-Network theory (LATOUR, 2012), in Descola, Más allá de la naturaleza y cultura (DESCOLA, 2012), in Viveiros de Castro, Cannibal Metaphysics - elements for a post- structural anthropology (VIVEIROS DE CASTRO, 2015). In addition to these reference works, a selective bibliographic search was made of academic articles that discussed the authors and the theme of the ontological turn in Anthropology, in order to complement the proposed work. It ended with initial advances in possible dialogues between the authors, counting as a conceptual guide the binomials nature / culture and or nature / society.
Downloads
References
DESCOLA, Philippe. Outras Naturezas, Outras Culturas. Tradução Cecília Ciscato. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2016.
DESCOLA, Philippe. Par-delà nature et culture. França: Ed. Gallimard, 2005.
FREIRE, Letícia de Luna Freire. Seguindo Bruno Latour: notas para uma antropologia simétrica. Comum, Rio de Janeiro, v. 11. p. 46-65, jan./jun., 2006.
GONZÁLEZ ABRISKETA, Olatz; CARRO RIPALDA, Susana. La Apertura Ontológica de la Antropología Contemporánea. Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares, Pais Vasco, v. LXXI, n.1, p.101-128, jan./jun. 2016.
GONZALEZ, Z. K.; BAUM, C. Desdobrando a Teoria Ator-Rede: reagregando o social no trabalho de Bruno Latour. Pólis e Psique, Rio Grande do Sul, v.3, n. 1, p. 142-157, 2013.
HENARE, A., HOLBRAAD M. e Wastell, S. Thinking through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically. Londres: Routledge, 2006.
KANT, Immanuel. Crítica da Razão Pura. Tradução de Manoela Pinto dos Santos. 5. ed. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 2001.
LATOUR, Bruno. Jamais fomos modernos: ensaio de antropologia simétrica. São Paulo: Editora 34, 1994.
LATOUR, Bruno. Reagregando o Social: uma introdução à Teoria do Ator-Rede. Salvador: Edufba. Bauru: EDUSC, 2012.
LÉVI-STRAUSS, Claude. As Estruturas elementares do parentesco. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1982.
LIMA, Tânia Stolze. O dois e seu múltiplo: reflexões sobre o perspectivismo em uma cosmologia tupi. Mana, Rio de Janeiro, v. 2, n. 2, p. 21-47, outubro de 1996.
NOBRE, J. C. De A.; PEDRO, R. M. L. R. Reflexões sobre possibilidades metodológicas da Teoria Ator-Rede. Cadernos UNIFOA, Volta Redonda, Ed. n. 14, p. 47-56, 2010.
TYLOR, Edward Burnett. Cultura Primitiva. Madrid: Ayuso, 1981 [1871].
VIVEIROS DE CASTRO, Eduardo. (Anthropology) AND (Science). After-Dinner Speech at Anthropology and Science. The 5th Decennial Conference of the Association of Social Anthropologists of the UK and the Commonwealth. Manchester Papers. In Social Anthropology, 2003.
VIVEIROS DE CASTRO, Eduardo. Metafísicas Canibais: elementos para uma antropologia pós-estrutural. São Paulo: Cosac Naify, 2015.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Submeto(emos) o trabalho apresentado, texto original, à avaliação da Revista do ICH, e concordo(amos) que os direitos autorais a ele referentes se tornem propriedade exclusiva da Editora PUC Minas, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outra parte ou meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico, sem que a necessária e prévia autorização seja solicitada por escrito e obtida junto à Editora. Declaro ainda que não existe conflito de interesse entre o tema abordado e o(s) autor(es), empresas, instituições ou indivíduos.
I (We) submit the presented article, an original text, to the evaluation of the Revista do ICH, and agree that its referring copyrights will become the exclusive property of the PUC Minas Publishing House, with any reproduction, either in full or in part, being forbidden in any other form or means of printed or electronic communication without the request for prior necessary written authorization to be obtained from the said Publishing House. I (We) also declare that there is no conflict of interests between the subject matter and the author (s), companies, institutions or individuals.