¿Cómo pensar hoy una política feminista en plural desde los aportes de Chandra T. Mohanty?
Keywords:
política, feminismos, estrategias.Abstract
Resumen
Se analizan los ejes centrales del artículo MOHANTY (2003), donde la autora relee críticamente MOHANTY (1984). El tono de sendos oscila entre la crítica a la falsa neutralidad de los discursos eurocéntricos y la crítica a la valoración de la diferencia sobre lo común en el discurso postmodernista. A su vez, hay un hilo que teje ambos y que se anuda en una preocupación central: cómo pensar un feminismo transcultural como proyecto político común construido desde la solidaridad feminista no colonizadora a través de las fronteras. La autora traza a nuestro juicio un mapa estratégico de posibilidades para pensar dicho proyecto, sobre ese mapa versará nuestra reflexión.
Palabras clave: política; feminismos; estrategias.
Abstract
The paper is an analysis of the articule MOHANTY (2003), where the authoress rereads critically MOHANTY (1984). The tone of both ranges between the critique to the false neutrality of the eurocentral speeches and the critique to the valuation of the difference over the common thing in the postmodernist speech. At the same time, both articules share one central worry: how not colonizing feminism can think a transcultural feminism as a political common project constructed from the solidarity across the borders. The hindu feminist propose, to our judgment, a strategic map of possibilities to think about it. Our aim is to present this map.
Key words: politics; feminisms; strategies.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
DECLARATION TERM:
I submit the presented work, an original text, for evaluation by the Sapere Aude journal of Philosophy and agree that its copyright will become the exclusive property of PUC Minas Publisher, prohibiting any reproduction, total or partial, in any other part or electronic/printed divulgation means before the necessary previous authorization is solicited and obtained from the Publisher. I also declare that there is no interest conflict between the aborded theme and the author, entrerprise, institution or individuals. I am not sure about this sentence and why it should be there. Do you publish any research that is subsidized by companies or that involves quantitative or qualitative interviews with participants?