Seignobos x Simiand: the quarrel of the historical method with social science in the early twentieth century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2237-8871.2018v19n30p123-141Keywords:
Historiography, Methodical School, Charles Seignobos, François Simiand.Abstract
This article aims to analyze the quarrel at the beginning of the twentieth century in France, but which had repercussions beyond the hexagon, between the Sciences History and Social Science, specifically the quarrel of the historical method with social science, between the historian Charles Seignobos (1854-1942) and the economist and sociologist François Simiand (1836-1935). The intellectual clash between Seignobos and Simiand is part of a larger process of institutionalization and professionalization of these areas of knowledge. Therefore, from this French socio-intellectual context, we intend to explore the debate between the historical method, proposed by the so-called Methodical School, led by Seignobos, and Social Science, which sought to gain academic-institutional space, represented by Simiand.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By submitting any manuscript (articles, reviews, or interviews) authors automatically assign full copyrights to PUC Minas. Authors are requested to ensure:
The absence of conflicts of interest (relations between authors, companies/ institutions or individuals with an interest in the topic covered by the article), as well as funding agencies or sponsoring institutions of the research that culminated in the article.
Todos os trabalhos submetidos estarão automaticamente inscritos sob uma licença creative commons do tipo "by-nc-nd/4.0".