The role of institutionalization in the representation of G20 agenda-setting

Authors

  • Andrea Freites Research Assistant, Chinese Studies Programme, Institute of International Studies, University of Chile

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1809-6182.2021v18n2p14-25

Keywords:

G20, Institutionalization, Agenda-Setting

Abstract

Reports claim under-representation of emerging countries in G20 agenda-setting (BENSON Y ZÜRN, 2019; LEI Y RUI, 2016; PRODI, 2016). This study sought to determine whether the degree of institutionalisation of the G20 is related to the imbalance in the representation of interests in its agenda-setting. Applying a qualitative methodology with a sequential strategy of two data collection and analysis techniques, it is corroborated that emerging countries assume less prominence in agenda-setting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BENSON, R. & ZÜRN, M. Untapped potential: How the G20 can strengthen global governance. South African Journal of International Affairs. DOI: 10.1080/10220461.2019.169457. 2010.
GUOYOU, S. BORQUEZ, A. & ZIBETTI, F. China’s Bilateral Free Trade Agreements as Strategic Alignments: Building of a Comprehensive Cooperation Network with Pragmatic Countries of the Latin American Pacific Rim. UNISCI 59 (2): 27-52. 2019.
COLLIER, D. & LEVITSKY, S. Democracia con adjetivos, innovación conceptual en la investigación comparada. La política, revista de estudios sobre el estado y la sociedad. 1998.
COOPER, A. & POULIOT, V. How much is global governance changing? The G20 as international practice. Cooperation and Conflict, 50(3), 334–350. DOI:10.1177/0010836715576007. 2015.
CRESWELL, J. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications. 2013.
DUQUE, J. La institucionalización partidista. Una propuesta de abordaje de las estructuras organizativas partidistas. Estudios Políticos No. 27. 2005.
GNATH & SCHMUCKER. The Role of the Emerging Countries in the G20: Agenda-setter, Veto Player or Spectator? College of Europe / UNU-CRIS. BRIGG 2011/2. 2011.
HE, A. Interaction between the G20 agenda and members’ national-level policy: a theoretical model for increasing G20 effectiveness. ORCID Icon Pages 601-620 |vi Published online: 13 Dec 2019 Download citation https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2019.1694064. 2019.
KACOWICZ, A. & MITRANI, M. ¿Por qué no tenemos teorías coherentes de relaciones internacionales sobre la globalización? Foro internacional, 56(2), 378-408. 2016.
KRASNER, S. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton University Press. 1999.
LEI, W. & RUI, W. G20 Institutionalization From Crisis-Management to Long-Term Global Governance. World Century Publishing Corporation and Shanghai. Institutes for International Studies China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, Vol. 2, No. 3, 347–364. DOI: 10.1142/S237774001650024X. 2016.
LEVITSKY, S. Institutionalization and Peronism: The Concept, the Case and the Case for Unpacking the Concept. Party Politics 1998 4: 77, DOI: 10.1177/1354068898004001004, Published by: SAGE. 2018
MAIHOLD, G. & VILLAMAR, Z. El G20 y los países emergentes”. Foro internacional, 56(1), 165-211. 2016.
OCAMPO, J. & STIGLITZ, J. From the G-20 to a Global Economic Coordination Council. Journal of Globalization and Development, 2. 9-9. 10.1515/1948-1837.1234. 2012.
PRODI, R. Global Governance and Global Summits from the G8 to the G20: History, Opportunities and Challenges”, China & World Economy. Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. 2016.
RAGIN, Ch. User's Guide to Fuzzy-Set / Qualitative Comparative Analysis. University
of Arizona Report. 2010.
REN, X. The G20: Emerging Chinese Leadership in Global Governance? Global Policy. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12504. 2017
SARTORI, G. Partidos y Sistemas de Partidos. Alianza editorial. 1991.
SHOME, P. The G20 Development Agenda. An Indian Perspective. EDITOR: Government of India. 2016.
SHOME, P. The g20 macroeconomic agenda. Edited by Government of India Publisher: Cambridge University Press, Online ISBN: 9781107279704, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279704. 2014.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-26

How to Cite

Freites, A. (2022). The role of institutionalization in the representation of G20 agenda-setting. Conjuntura Internacional, 18(2), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1809-6182.2021v18n2p14-25

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021): CONJUNTURA INTERNACIONAL

Section

ARTIGOS

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a.Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).