Social Trust and Intercommunal Relations in Pre-Crisis Syria

Reflections from Syrian Refugees in Brazil

Autori

  • Danny Zahreddine Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
  • Guilherme Di Lorenzo Pires Instituto de Educação Continuada (IEC) PUC Minas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1809-6182.2024v21n3p26-46

Parole chiave:

Trust, Syria, Sectarism

Abstract

This article examines social trust among religious communities in Syria and its role in
escalating tensions before the 2011 conflict. Understanding intercommunal trust is crucial
to analyzing the dynamics that led to violence between the regime and opposition. Based
on a 2019 study with Syrian refugees in Brazil, it presents findings from a questionnaire
exploring perceptions of social trust in Syria since the 1990s. The study did not explicitly
address the 2011 conflict or refugee status but focused on intercommunal relations before
2010. The article details the methodology, analyzes responses, and discusses findings within
the broader empirical literature on Syria’s pre-crisis sociopolitical landscape.

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Biografie autore

Danny Zahreddine, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)

Prof. Danny Zahreddine holds a PhD in Geography (2010) from the Postgraduate Program in Geography - Spatial Information Treatment at PUC Minas, a Master's degree in Geography from the same program (2004), a Bachelor's degree in International Relations from the Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais (2001), and a degree in Tourism from the Higher School of Tourism at PUC Minas (2012). He is currently Director of the Institute of Social Sciences at PUC Minas and Adjunct Professor IV of the Department of International Relations, being a permanent member of the Postgraduate Program in International Relations. He was a visiting professor at Peking University (China) in 2014, a Research Fellow at the Moshe Dayan Center (2017), and a visiting professor at the Universidad Nacional de Rosario (Argentina) in 2018. He is the leader of the Middle East and Maghreb Research Group (GEOMM) and a member of the Middle Powers Research Group (GPPM). He has experience in the area of ​​International Relations and Geography, working mainly on the following topics: Regional Studies and Hotspots with an emphasis on the Middle East, Theory of International Relations, International Politics, Brazilian Foreign Policy, Political Bargaining, Geopolitics, Geodemography, Geographic Information System (GIS).

Guilherme Di Lorenzo Pires, Instituto de Educação Continuada (IEC) PUC Minas

PhD in International Relations from the Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais (2019). Master's degree in International Relations from the Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais (2013) and a degree in History from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (2010). Associate researcher at the Middle East and Maghreb Research Group (PUC-Minas). Experienced in the History of International Relations, with emphasis on the History of the Middle East, nationalist movements and internal conflicts.

Riferimenti bibliografici

BAR-TAL, Daniel; ALON, Ilai. Sociopsychological Approach to Trust (or Distrust): concluding comments. BAR-TAL, Daniel; AILON, Ilai (ed.). The Role of Trust in Conflict Resolution: the Israeli-Palestinian case and beyond. Gewerbestrasse: Springer, 2016.

BAUER, Paul C.; FREITAG, Markus. Measuring Trust. In: USLANER, Eric M. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
COX, Fletcher D.; SISK, Timothy D.; HESTER, Elizabeth. Introduction. In: COX, Fletcher D.; SISK, Timothy D. (Ed.). Peacebuilding in Deeply Divided Societies: Toward Social Cohesion?. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.

GAMBETTA, Diego. Can We Trust? In: GAMBETTA, Diego (ed.). Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.

GOLDSMITH, Leon. Cycle of Fear: Syria’s Alawites in War and Peace. London: Hurst & Company, 2015.

HARB, Charles. Developing a Social Cohesion Index for the Arab Region. Amman: United Nations Development Programme Regional Bureau for Arab States (RBAS), 2017.

HEWSTONE, Miles; KENWORTHY, Jared B.; CAIRNS, Ed; TAUSCHE, Nicole; HUGHES, Joanne; TAM, Tania; VOCI, Alberto; VON HECKER; PINDER, Catherine. Stepping Stones to Reconciliation in Northern Ireland: Intergroup Contact, Forgiveness, and Trust. In: NADLER, Arie; MALLOY, Thomas; FISCHER, Rey (ed.). The Social Psychology of Intergroup Reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

KERR, Michael. For God, Syria, Bashar and nothing Else? In: KERR, Michael; LARKIN, CRAIG. The Alawis of Syria: war, Faith and politics in the Levant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

KRAMER, Roderick M. Ingroup-Outgroup Trust: barriers, benefits, and bridges. In: USLANER, Eric M. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.

KRAMER, Roderick; CARNEVALE, Peter J. Trust and Intergroup Negotiation. In: BROWN, Rupert; GAERTNER, Samuel L. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes. Malden, Blackwell publishers, 2003.

LANGER, Arnim. STEWART, Frances. SMEDTS, Cristien; DEMAREST, Leila. Conceptualising and measuring social cohesion in Africa: Towards a perceptions-based index. In: Social Indicators Research. V.131, n.1, p.321-343, 2017.

LEFÈVRE, Raphaël. The Syrian Muslim Brotherhood’s Alawi Conundrum. In: KERR, Michael; LARKIN, Craig (ed.). The Alawis of Syria: war, Faith and politics in the Levant. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.

LENARD, Patti Tamara; MILLER, David. Trust and National Identity. In: USLANER, Eric M. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. New Yro: Oxford University Press, 2018.

RABO, Annika. Conviviality and Conflict in Contemporary Aleppo. In: LONGAVA, Anh Nga; ROALD, Anne Sofie (ed.). Religous Minorities in the Middle East: domination, self-empowerment, accommodation. Leiden: Brill, 2012.

RABO, Annika. We are Christians and we are equal citizens’: perspectives on particularity and pluralism in contemporary Syria. In: Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, v.23, n.1, 2012.

SALAMANDRA, Christa. Sectarianism in Syria: Anthropological Reflections. In: Middle East Critique. V.22, n.3, P.303-306, 2013.

SPENCE, Rebecca. Spence, R. (1999). The centrality of community-led recovery. In: HARRIS, Geoff (ed.). Recovery from Armed Conflict in Developing Countries: an economic and political analysis. London: Routledge, 1999.

TAJFEL, Henri. Social Identity and Intergroup Behavior. In: Social Science Information. v.13, n.2, p.65-93, 1974.

YAMAGASHI, Toshio; YAMAGASHI, Midori.Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan. In Motivation and Emotion. v.18, n.2, p.129-166, 1994.

ZAHREDDINE, D.; PIRES, G. L. . Horizontal inequalities and multi-sectarian societies: a study about the perception by Syrian refugees in Brazil of the socioeconomic situation and groups inequalities in Syria before the 2011 uprising. Conjuntura Austral. Revista do Núcleo Brasileiro de Estratégia e Relações Internacionais da UFRGS, v. 13, p. 82, 2022.

ZIADEH, Radwan. Power and Policy in Syria: The Intelligence Services, Foreign Relations and Democracy in the Modern Middle East. London: I. B. Tauris, 2011.

Downloads

Pubblicato

2025-03-23

Come citare

Zahreddine, D., & Di Lorenzo Pires, G. (2025). Social Trust and Intercommunal Relations in Pre-Crisis Syria: Reflections from Syrian Refugees in Brazil. Conjuntura Internacional, 21(3), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1809-6182.2024v21n3p26-46

Fascicolo

V. 21 N. 3 (2024): CONJUNTURA INTERNACIONAL

Sezione

"What does Middle East Studies mean in Latin America?"

Licenza

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

1. Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

2.Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

3.Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).