THE REINVENTION OF MEMORY BETWEEN THE MODELS OF SUBJECTIVATION IN FREUDIAN THEORY

Abstract

Since the proposition of the theory of “functional specialization” or “localizationism”, neuropsychic studies have proposed that the functioning of memory is similar to such scope. However, in view of the initial investments of this proposal, simultaneously, an opposing theory entitled “holistic” by some viewers began to gain relevance. In this case, the psychic functioning would occur in a dynamic way, because instead of specialized centers processing neurofunctional attributions, these would occur as results of conflicts, of discontinued inscriptions, of a logical pluralism before the mnemonic process. Such tension will be central to the establishment of the psychoanalytic clinic and to the potentiation of Freudian research in the face of the subjective production of the unconscious, its formalization, its ethical consequences and the foundation of praxis. Nevertheless, it will lead to the re-categorization of the nature of memory, now endowed with a “producing” premise and not only “transcriptive”, will provide psychoanalysis to affiliate itself to the time of “passages” and “transformations” to that of ontological alterity that belongs to it.