CONDUCT ADJUSTMENT TERM AS SUBSTITUTIVE MEANS OF ENVIRONMENTAL LICENSING

ANALYSIS OF THE CONSTITUCINALITY OF ART. 16, §9 OF STATE LAW 7.772/1980 BY THE COURT JUSTICE OF MINAS GERAIS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2318-7999.2024v27n54p276-292

Keywords:

Environmental Law. Environmental licensing. Conduct Adjustment Term. Concurrent competence. Direct Action of Unconstitutionality.

Abstract

This article proposes to analyze a decision of the Court of Justice of Minas Gerais (TJMG) in the event of Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI) that declared non-compliance with the Federal Constitution of 1988 of a provision of legislation that allowed the environmental offender to resume suspended activities by signing a Conduct Adjustment Term (TAC) with state environmental agencies. To this end, the study analyzes the current panorama of Minas Gerais environmental protection network, conveys an overview of the legal institutes of environmental licensing and TAC, deepens in the state legislative process that originated the device before launching into the interpretation of the ADI judgment. A documental and bibliographic research was conducted to, by means of the deductive and comparative methods, understand the grounds of the TJMG regarding the matter.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

José Guilherme Castro, Escola Superior Dom Hélder

Advogado, mestrando em Direito Ambiental e Desenvolvimento Sustentável

Beatriz Souza Costa, Escola Superior Dom Helder Câmara

Pós-doutora em Direito pela Universidad Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM). Doutora e mestre em
Direito Constitucional pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). Pró-Reitora de Pesquisa
e Professora do mestrado e doutorado em Direito Ambiental e Desenvolvimento Sustentável da
ESDHC

Published

2024-12-23