The The ambiguity present in Nietzsche's relationship with skepticism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2177-6342.2020v11n21p259-275Keywords:
Skepticism. Creation. Philosophy of the future. Nietzsche. Truth.Abstract
This article is intended to discuss the relationship between Nietzsche and skepticism. In some passages the philosopher praises the skeptics, but in others, he comes to refer to them as decadents. Still, at certain moments of his text, Nietzsche claims to himself another type of skepticism: experimental and creator which, seen more closely, does not identify with the versions of skepticism affirmed during the history of Philosophy. Thus, in order to understand the ambiguity present in Nietzsche's relationship with skepticism, we divided our work into three sections. In the first, it will be sought to explain the understanding that the philosopher has about the question of truth, in contrast to dogmatic understanding. In the second section the objective will be to discuss the ways in which skepticism appears in the nietzschian text, in order to clarify the philosopher's view of this tradition. Finally, in the third section, the text will develop with Nietzsche's skeptical voice. This voice of his does not identify with the skeptical voices of yored. The nietzschian skepticism – creator – does not accept the paralyzing of the will, on the contrary, comes to life for the creation of new and aggrandizing possibilities of oneself.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
DECLARATION TERM:
I submit the presented work, an original text, for evaluation by the Sapere Aude journal of Philosophy and agree that its copyright will become the exclusive property of PUC Minas Publisher, prohibiting any reproduction, total or partial, in any other part or electronic/printed divulgation means before the necessary previous authorization is solicited and obtained from the Publisher. I also declare that there is no interest conflict between the aborded theme and the author, entrerprise, institution or individuals. I am not sure about this sentence and why it should be there. Do you publish any research that is subsidized by companies or that involves quantitative or qualitative interviews with participants?