Some considerations on the teleological modal

Authors

  • Nathalia Gravonski Codinhoto Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Núbia Ferreira Rech Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2358-3428.2020v24n51p47-70

Keywords:

Teleological modal. Anankastic conditional. Relationship between way and goal. Modal orientation. Negation.

Abstract

This paper presents syntactic and semantic properties of the teleological modal. Based on authors like Sæbo (2001, 2017), von Fintel & Iatridou (2005) and Copley (2010), we approach aspects related to the construction in which this modal appears, showing its differences in relation to the other root modals - interpreted in a low position in the structure. We show how a construction with the teleological modal relates information that corresponds to the way and the goal. We also approach modal orientation and its co-occurrence with a negation item. As for the modal orientation, we relate the participant for whom the modal is oriented with the position in which it is interpreted in the structure. As for the negation, we show that it does not operate only on the event described in the modal sentence, but also on the relationship between way and goal, negation the biunivocity of this relationship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BASSO, R.; ILARI, R. Estativos e suas características. Revista brasileira de linguística aplicada, v. 4, n. 1, 2004, p. 15-26.
CINQUE, G. Adverbs and Functional Heads: a cross-linguistic perspective. New York: editora Oxford University Press, 1999.
COPLEY, Bridget. Towards a Teleological Model for Modals. In: CNRS, 8, 2010, Paris. Paris Working Sessions on Modality, Goals, and Events. Paris: Sfl, 2010. p.1-14.
von FINTEL, Kai & Sabine Iatridou. 2005. What to do if you want to go to Harlem: Anankastic conditionals and related matters. Manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://web.mit.edu/fintel/fintel-iatridou-2005- harlem.pdf.
FRANKIE, M. Teleological Tecessity and Only. 2006. Disponível em: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254703235_Teleological_Necessity_and_Only>. Acesso em: 5 de fevereiro de 2020.

HACQUARD, V. On the Event Relativity of Modal Auxiliaries. Natural Language Semantics, 18(1). 2010, p. 79-114.

HACQUARD, V. Aspects of modality. 2006. Tese de Doutorado. Massaschusetts institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2006.
KRATZER, A. The notional category of modality. In: EIKMEYER, H-J.; RIESER, H. (Orgs.) Word, worlds, and contexts: new approaches to word semantics. Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 1981. p. 38-74.
KRATZER, A. Modals and Conditionals. NewYork: Oxford University Press, 2012.
RECH, N. F.; VARASCHIN, G. Predicados estativos e os tipos de deôntico: ought-to-do e ought-to-be. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos, Campinas, v. 60, n. 1, p. 159-177, 2018.
RECH, N. F.; VARASCHIN, G. Predicados inacusativos e a modalidade deôntica. Revista Letras, Curitiba, n. 96, p. 219-238, 2017.
SÆBØ, Kjell Johan: 2001. “Necessary Conditions in a Natural Language.” In Caroline F´ery & Wolfgang Sternefeld (Editors) Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festchrift for Arnim von Stechow, pages 427–449. Akademie Verlag. Preprint http://vivaldi.sfs.nphil.uni-tuebingen.de/ ∼arnim10/Festschrift/Saeboe-8-komplett%20fertig.pdf.
SÆBØ, Kjell Johan. Chapter 61 Anankastic conditionals: If you want to go to Harlem, Kjell Johan Sæbø, University of Oslo k.j.sabo@ilos.uio.no. 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.hf.uio.no/ilos/english/people/aca/kjelljs/chapter61.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 de fevereiro de 2020.

Published

2020-09-23

How to Cite

CODINHOTO, Nathalia Gravonski; RECH, Núbia Ferreira. Some considerations on the teleological modal. Scripta, Belo Horizonte, v. 24, n. 51, p. 47–70, 2020. DOI: 10.5752/P.2358-3428.2020v24n51p47-70. Disponível em: https://periodicos.pucminas.br/scripta/article/view/22960. Acesso em: 28 aug. 2025.