Dependência entre ser, tempo e narrativa em Ricoeur

Authors

  • Bárbara Tortato

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2358-3428.2020v24n51p432-454

Keywords:

Tempo. Narrativa. Ação. Configuração. Linguagem.

Abstract

The intelligible narrative structure proposed by Ricoeur depends on the semantics of action, the symbolization of action and temporality. We will try to demonstrate not only an ability of the action to be narrated so that this temporality is (humanly) significant, but also a need for this action to be narrated and a narrative’s need so that the temporality is (humanly) understood. Ricoeur suggests that language has a “reserve of usual meanings” that were created by the relationship - and support the relationship - of dependence between being, time and narrative and the expressions that do it, and that unfold from verb tenses to adverbs of time. To justify the Ricoeurian theory, we will go through Augustine's threefold present and Heidegger's hermeneutic phenomenology, seeking to understand how this practical ordering of time is done on a daily basis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

RICŒUR, Paul. De l’interpretation: essay sur Freud. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1965.
RICŒUR, Paul. Temps et récit I. Paris: Seuil, 1983.
RICŒUR, Paul. Temps et récit III: Le temps raconté. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1985.
RICŒUR, Paul. Mimèsis, référence et refiguration dans Temps et Récit. In: Études phénoménologiques, Tome VI, nº 11. Ed. Ousia, 1990b. p. 29-40.
RICŒUR, Paul. Do texto à acção. Porto: Ed. Rés.
KEMP, In: GREISCH, Jean; KEARNEY, Richard. Paul Ricœur: les métamorphoses de la raison herméneutique. Paris: Cerf, 1991, p. 342.

Published

2020-09-23

How to Cite

TORTATO, Bárbara. Dependência entre ser, tempo e narrativa em Ricoeur. Scripta, Belo Horizonte, v. 24, n. 51, p. 432–454, 2020. DOI: 10.5752/P.2358-3428.2020v24n51p432-454. Disponível em: https://periodicos.pucminas.br/scripta/article/view/22965. Acesso em: 10 sep. 2025.