Explicitação ou implicatura? Um exemplo de comunicação intercultural
Keywords:
Pragmática, Explicitações, Comunicação inferencial, Locutor, Intenção Informativa.Abstract
Defende a hipótese de que o domínio principal das investigações sobre a pragmática das línguas naturais constitui-se de explicitações. Esta hipótese opõe-se a teses defendidas na pragmática, que diz que o interesse da comunicação inferencial é justamente a possibilidade para o locutor de comunicar implicitamente sua intenção informativa, ou ainda se o locutor não diz explicitamente aquilo que quer dizer, é porque ele pode ter boas ou más razões para não querer dizê-lo.
Downloads
References
ANSCOMBRE, Jean-Claude, “Voulez-vous dériver avec moi”. Communication, v.32, 1980. p. 11-60.
ANSCOMBRE, Jean-Claude ; DUCROT, Oswald. L’Argumentation dans la langue. Bruxelles: Mardaga, 1983.
CARSTON, Robyn. Thoughts and utterances. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2002.
DENNETT, Daniel. La stratégie de l’interprète: le sens commun et
l’univers quotidien. Paris: Gallimard, 1990.
DUCROT, Oswald. Dire et ne pas dire, Paris: Hermann, 1972.
DUCROT, Oswald . Les échelles argumentatives. Paris: Minuit, 1980.
DUCROT, Oswald et al. Les mots du discours. Paris: Minuit., 1980.
EGNER, Inge. Intercultural aspects of the speech act of. promising: western and African practices. Intercultural Pragmatics, v.3, n.4, 2006. p.443-464.
GRICE, H. Paul. Studies in the ways of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.
HAUSER, Marc. The evolution of communication. Cambridge: MIT
Press, 1996.
HORN, Laurence Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Qbased and R-based implicature”. In: SCHIFFRIN, Deborah (Ed.) Meaning, form, and use in context, Washington: Georgetown University Press, 1984. p.11-42.
KLEIBER, Georges, Mais à quoi sert donc le mot CHOSE? Une situation paradoxale, Langue Française, n.73, 1987. p. 109-127.
LAKOFF, Robyn, The logic of politeness: Or minding your p’s and q’s, In: COLUM, C. et al. (Ed.). Proceedings of the Nineth regional meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1973. p. 292-305.
LEVINSON, Stephen C. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, l983.
LEVINSON, Stephen C. Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.
MOESCHLER, Jacques. Speech act theory and the analysis of conversation. In: VANDERVEKEN, Daniel; SUSUMU, Kubo. Essays in speech act theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2002. p. 239-261.
MOESCHLER, Jacques. Intercultural pragmatics: a cognitive approach. Intercultural Pragmatics, v.1, n.1, 2004. p.49-70.
MOESCHLER, Jacques. French Tradition in pragmatics: from structuralisme to cognitivism. Intercultural Pragmatics, v.3, n.4, 2006. p. 381-407.
MOESCHLER, Jacques ; REBOUL, Anne. Dictionnaire encyclopédique
de pragmatique. Paris: Ed. Du Seuil, 1994.
MOESCHLER, Jacques; REBOUL, Anne. La pragmatique aujourd’hui:
une nouvelle science de la communication. Paris: Ed. du Seuil, 1998.
MORGAN, Jerry. Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In: COLE, Peter (Ed.) Syntax & Semantics 9: pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 1978. p. 261-80.
PINKER, Steven. L’instinct du langage. Paris: Odile Jacob, 1999.
REBOUL, Anne; MOESCHLER, Jacques. La Pragmatique aujourd’hui.
Paris: Ed. Du Seuil, 1998.
SABAH, Gérard. L’intelligence artificielle et le langage II: processus de compréhension. Hermes: Paris, 1989.
SEARLE, John R. Sens et expression. Paris: Minuit, 1982.
SPERBER, Dan. Understanding verbal understanding. In: KHALFA, Jean (Ed.), What is Intelligence? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. p. 179-198.
SPERBER, Dan. La contagion des idées. Paris: Odile Jacob, 1996.
SPERBER, Dan ; WILSON, Deirdre. La Pertinence. Paris: Minuit, 1989.
VAN DER HENST, Jean-Baptiste et al. Dealing with contradiction in a communicative context: a cross-cultural study. Intercultural Pragmatics, v.3, n.4, 2006. p.465-485.
WILSON, Deirdre; SPERBER, Dan. Relevance theory. In: HORN, Laurence R.; WARD, Gregory (Ed.) Handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004. p. 607-632.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By submitting any manuscript (articles, reviews, or interviews) authors automatically assign full copyrights to PUC Minas. Authors are requested to ensure:
• The absence of conflicts of interest (relations between authors, companies/ institutions or individuals with an interest in the topic covered by the article), as well as funding agencies or sponsoring institutions of the research that culminated in the article.
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 International.
