A NÃO REDUÇÃO DA EPISTEMOLOGIA AS CIÊNCIAS COGNITIVAS E A QUESTÃO DO DISJUNTIVISMO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2177-6342.2020v11n21p222-238Keywords:
Burge, cognitive sciences, disjunctivism, epistemology, McDowellAbstract
In this pappers I address the issue of reducing epistemology to the cognitive sciences, exploring the debate between Burge and McDowell about epistemological disjunctivism. In this way, I begin by pointing out the indistinguishable thesis that states that there is a common denominator between a true perceptual experience and a misleading perceptual experience. I will show that this thesis motivates a skeptical argument. Then I present McDowell's disjunctivist position, which states that although they have a common denominator, veridical and non-veridical experiences differ in cognitive value. I show Burge's criticisms of McDowell's disjunctivism, and his thesis that the perceptual experience must be addressed by the cognitive sciences. After that, I show McDowell's response to Burge that the epistemic character of experience differs from the descriptive character of the cognitive sciences. Finally, I say why epistemology cannot be reduced to epistemology.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
DECLARATION TERM:
I submit the presented work, an original text, for evaluation by the Sapere Aude journal of Philosophy and agree that its copyright will become the exclusive property of PUC Minas Publisher, prohibiting any reproduction, total or partial, in any other part or electronic/printed divulgation means before the necessary previous authorization is solicited and obtained from the Publisher. I also declare that there is no interest conflict between the aborded theme and the author, entrerprise, institution or individuals. I am not sure about this sentence and why it should be there. Do you publish any research that is subsidized by companies or that involves quantitative or qualitative interviews with participants?