PROBLEMATISING BERGER’S CONCEPT OF PLURALISM: of a critical study of dual religious belonging in the Science of Religion

Main Article Content

Renato Carvalho de Oliveira

Abstract

Pluralism, according to Berger, is a concept associated with social phenomena, modernity, individual choice, and diversity of and within religions. Our thesis is that the problematiszation of pluralism provides opportunities and limitations limits for a critical study of dual religious belonging that includes theoretical and empirical approaches. The main general aim is the epistemological study exam of pluralism. The specific aims are: [1] to understand Berger's concept of pluralism; [2] and to delineate the possibilities and limitations of Berger's the bergerian vision of pluralism for the critical study of dual belonging. In the text's methodology, the first part will deal with Berger's pluralism, while the second part will focus consist on the possibilities and limitations of Berger's approach to pluralism for the critical study of dual belonging. We have arrived at two results: [a] Berger's sociology of religion allows for the possibility of studying dual religious affiliation through an empirical approach, based on hypotheses derived from the critical analysis of pluralism, which can be confirmed or refuted through field observations. We conclude that, in the Sciece of Religion, the critical study of dual religious affiliation would reconcile the empirical and theoretical approaches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
OLIVEIRA, Renato Carvalho de. PROBLEMATISING BERGER’S CONCEPT OF PLURALISM:: of a critical study of dual religious belonging in the Science of Religion . INTERAÇÕES, Belo Horizonte, v. 19, n. 1, p. e191t10, 2024. DOI: 10.5752/P.1983-2478.2024v19n1e191t10. Disponível em: https://periodicos.pucminas.br/interacoes/article/view/31614. Acesso em: 20 aug. 2025.
Section
ARTICLES
Author Biography

Renato Carvalho de Oliveira, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais

Mestre em Filosofia pela Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Doutorando em Ciências da Religião pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais. ORCID: 0000-0002-6523-6394. Brasil. E-mail: renatoamdg@protonmail.com.

References

AMMERMAN, Nancy T. Response by Nancy T. Ammerman: modern altars in everyday life. In: BERGER, Peter Ludwig. The many altars of modernity: toward a paradigm for religion in a pluralist age. Boston/Berlin: 2014. p. 94-110.

BECKFORD, James A. Re-thinking pluralism. In. GIORDAN, Giuseppe; PACE, Enzo. Religious pluralism: framing religious diversity in the contemporary world. London: Springer, 2014. p. 15-29.

BERGER, Peter Ludwig. A dessecularização do mundo: uma visão global. Religião e Sociedade, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 21, n. 1, p. 9-24, 2000.

BERGER, Peter Ludwig. The many altars of modernity: toward a paradigm for religion in a pluralist age. Boston/Berlim: 2014.

CAMPOS, Fabiano Victor. Explicar e compreender: a querela em torno do procedimento epistemológico próprio da Ciência da Religião. In: SENRA, Flávio; CAMPOS, Fabiano Victor; ALMEIDA, Tatiane (Orgs.). A epistemologia das ciências da religião: pressupostos, questões e desafios. Curitiba: Editora CRV, 2020. p. 69-100.

FOUCAULT, Michel. Du gouvernement des vivants: cours au Collège de France, 1979-1980. Paris: Gallimard: Seuil, 2012.

FOUCAULT, Michel. L’herméneutique du sujet: cours au Collège de France (1981-1982). Paris: Gallimard: Seuil, 2001.

HERVIEU-LÉGER, Danièle. In Memoriam Peter Ludwig Berger (1929-2017), sociologue de la pluralité religieuse. Archives de sciences sociales des religions [En ligne], n. 179, p. 9-14, jui-sept. 2017. Disponível em: https://journals.openedition.org/assr/29563. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2023.

MARIZ, Cecília Loreto. Sobre a pessoa e a obra de Peter Berger. [Entrevista concedida a] Alberto da Silva Moreira. Caminhos, Goiânia, v. 20, n. 1, p. 87-98, jan./abr. 2022.

PANASIEWICZ, Roberlei. Diálogo Inter-religioso. In: RIBEIRO, Claudio Oliveira; ARAGÃO, Gilbraz; PANASIEWICZ, Roberlei (Orgs.). Dicionário do pluralismo religioso. São Paulo: Recriar, 2020. p. 43-50.

PIERUCCI, Antônio Flávio. Reencantamento e dessecularização: a propósito do auto-engano em sociologia da religião. Novos Estudos: CEBRAP, São Paulo, n. 49, p. 99-117, nov. 1997.

PLURALISM. In: HUGHES, Aaron W.; MCCUTCHEON, Russell T. Religion in 50 words: a critical vocabulary. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2022. p. 199-205.

TEIXEIRA, Faustino. Peter Berger e a religião. In: TEIXEIRA, Faustino (Org.). Sociologia da religião: enfoques teóricos. 4. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2011. p. 218-248.

TOSTES, Angelica. Múltipla pertença religiosa. In: RIBEIRO, Claudio Oliveira; ARAGÃO, Gilbraz; PANASIEWICZ, Roberlei (Orgs.). Dicionário do pluralismo religioso. São Paulo: Recriar, 2020. p. 156-161.

WACH, Joachim Ernst Adolphe Felix. O método. In: WACH, Joachim Ernst Adolphe Felix. Sociologia da Religião. São Paulo: Paulinas, 1990. p. 11-29.

WACH, Joachim Ernst Adolphe Felix. Os ramos da Ciência da Religião. São Paulo: REVER, v. 18, n. 2, p. 233-253, mai/ago 2018.

YANG, Fenggang. Response by Fenggang Yang: agency-driven secularization and Chinese experiments in multiple modernities. In: BERGER, Peter Ludwig. The many altars of modernity: toward a paradigm for religion in a pluralist age. Boston/Berlin: 2014. p. 123-140.