DECOLONIAL CHALLENGES TO RELIGIOUS STUDIES
Main Article Content
Abstract
In recent times, an ideological critique of the main concepts of religious studies has been carried out. However, that same criticism is not made in relation to the very notion of science. Rather, these critiques reveal the close connection between religious studies and a conception of modernity and science. The purpose of this article is to show how the radicalization of this criticism through decolonial theories leads to openness to other epistemologies, which challenges some assumptions made in religious studies. The central question is: would opening up to other rationalities imply the dissolution of religious studies into many regional theologies? In other words, to what extent would the resistance to this decolonial radicalization through the affirmation of scientific and social approaches to religion, observed in certain trends in current religious studies, reveal a challenge brought by the decolonial theory to religious studies? To address this problem, this article is divided into three sections. In the first part, it points to the main features of what is understood as decolonial, adopting the thought of Walter Mignolo as a reference. In the second part, the article highlights the close connection between religious studies and modern epistemological values. Finally, the article raises some questions and implications that come from the decolonial turn toward the field of religious studies.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors will retain the copyright and grants to the journal the right of the first publication, with simultaneous license to the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this publication.
- Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on your personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase impact and citation published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
ARNAL, William; McCUTCHEON, Russel. The Sacred is the Profane. The Political Nature of “Religion”. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
BARRETO, Raimundo; SIRVENT, Roberto. Decolonial Christianities. Palgrave: Macmillan, 2019.
BLEEKER, Claas Jouco. Evaluation of previous methods: Commentary. In: HONKO, L (org.). Science of Religion: Studies in Methodology. Proceedings of the Study Conference of the International Association for the History of Religions. The Hague, Paris and New York: Mouton Publishers, 1979.
DASS, Veena. Subaltern as perspective. Subaltern Studies, v. 6, p. 310-324, 1989. Disponível em: https://www.academia.edu/637675/Subaltern_as_perspective. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2024.
ELIADE, Mircea; KITAGAWA, John. The History of Religions. Essays on Methodology. University of Chicago, 1959.
FITZGERALD, Timothy. The Ideology of Religious Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
GEERTZ, Armin. Global Perspectives on Methodology in the Study of Religion. In: HUGHES, Aaron (org.). Theory and Method in the Study of Religion: Twenty fiver years on. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2013.
GREENBERG, Clement. Modernist Painting. In: BATTCOCK, Gregory (org.). The New Art: A Critical Anthology. New York: Dutton, 1960.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987.
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Nietzsche. Zweiter Band. Gesamtausgabe, v. 6.2. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klosterman, 1997.
JOY, Morny. Postcolonial reflections: Challegentes for Religious Studies. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, v. 13, n. 2, p. 177-195, 2001. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23549968. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2024.
KANT, Immanuel. Idea for an Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose. In: REISS, Hans Siegbert (org.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. p. 41–53.
KANT, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
KING, Richard. Philosophy of Religion as Border Control: Globalization and the Decolonization of the “Love of Wisdom” (philosophia). In: IRVINE, Andew; BILIMORIA, Purushottama (orgs.). Postcolonial Philosophy of Religion. Springer, 2009, p. 35-53.
LEEUW, Gerard van der. Religion in Essence and Manifestation. New York: Harper & Row, 1963.
LUTHER, Martin; WIEBE, Donald. Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion. Religio: Revue pro religionistiku, v. 20, n. 1, p. 9-18, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfs042. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2024.
MASUZAWA, Tomoko. The Invention of World Religions: Or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
MBEMBE, Achille. Necropolicts. Durham: Duke University Press, 2019.
MIGNOLO, Walter. Enduring Enchantment: Secularism and the Epistemic Privileges of Modernity. In: IRVINE, Andrew; BILIMORIA, Purushottama (0rgs.). Postcolonial Philosophy of Religion. Springer, 2009. p. 273-293.
MIGNOLO, Walter. La idea de América Latina: la herida colonial y la opción decolonial. Barcelona: Gedisa, 2007.
MIGNOLO, Walter. Local Histories/Global Designs. Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
MIGNOLO, Walter; WALSH, Catherine. On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. Durham/London: Duke University Press, 2018.
MORTON, Stephen. Poststructuralist formulations. In: McLEOD, John (org.). The Routledge Companion to Postcolonial Theories. London and New York: Routledge, 2007.
MÜLLER, Friedrich Max. Introduction to the Science of Religion. London: Longmans, 1893.
PAZ, Octavio. Children of the Mire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
PIEPER, Frederico. O fim da metafísica e a diferença colonial. Reflexão, 48, p. 01-13, 2023a. Disponível em: https://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/reflexao/article/view/8566/7759. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2024.
PIEPER, Frederico. Desconstrução da categoria “Religião” e seus desdobramentos epistemológicos. Numen, v. 26, n. 2, p. 168-187, 2023b. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/numen/article/view/42524/26719. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2024.
QUIJANO, Aníbal. Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality. Cultural Studies, v.21, n. 2-3, p. 168–78, 2007. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2024.
RODRIGUES, Elisa. Ensino religioso, tolerância e cidadania na escola pública. Numen, Juiz de Fora, v. 16, n.1, p. 211-219, 2013. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/numen/article/view/21886. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2024.
SAID, Edward. Orientalism. 25th anniversary ed. New York: Penguin Books, 2003.
SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa. The End of Cognitive Empire: The Coming of Epistemologies of South. Durham & London: Duke University Press, 2018.
SMART, Ninian. The science of religion and the sociology of knowledge: some methodological questions. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973.
SMITH, Jonathan Zittell. Religion, Religions, Religious. In: TAYLOR, Mark (org.). Critical Terms for Religious Studies. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1998. p. 269-284.
SMITH, Wilfred. La Religion comparada: A donde y por que?. In: ELIADE, Mircea; KITAGAWA, Joseph (orgs.). Metodología de la historia de las religiones. Barcelona: Paidos, 1996. p. 53-85.
SMITH, Wilfred. The Meaning and the End of Religion. Fortress Press. Reprint Edition, 1991.
STRENSKI, Ivan. Ideological Critique in the Study of Religion Real Thinkers, Real Contexts and a Little Humility. In: ANTES, Peter; GEERTZ, Armin; WARNE, Randi Ruth (orgs.). New Approaches to the Study of Religion: Regional, Critical, and Historical Approaches. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2004. p. 271-293.
TIELE, Cornelis Petrus. Elements of the Science of Religion. London: William Blackwood and Sons, 1897.
TODOROV, Tzvetan. The Conquest of America: The Quest of Other. University of Oklahoma Press, 2011.
VATTIMO, Gianni. The Transparent Society. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1992.
WALLERSTEIN, Immanuel. European Universalism: the Rhetoric of Power. New York: New Press, 2006.
WIEBE, Donald. Change the name! On the importance of reclaiming NAASR’s original objectives for the twenty-first century. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, v. 25, n. 4–5, p. 1–22, 2013. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341299. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2024.
WIEBE, Donald. The Politics of Religious Studies. The continuing conflict with Theology in the academy. New York: Palgrave, 1999.