JOTTINGS ON THE CONCEPT OF TRUTH some tips for Theology
Main Article Content
Abstract
Traditional theories of truth are here presented, from the correspondence one to that of consensus. Constructivism is shown as an alternative to the social sciences and humanities, which display emancipatory traits, and this is taken into account in their concept of truth. Regarding religion, truth is more of an experiential type, but theology must follow the criteria of truth common to other sciences. Therefore, criticisms from new atheists do not hold, since they think that religion has only a cognitive science. However, they are right in pointing out human propensity to deception and self-deception (delusion), albeit these are common to all fields of knowledge. Theology has also to question itself about what kind of empirical evidences it has to ground its assertions. Religious pluralism (and therefore different truth claims) is a problem, but understanding the common roots of religion as explained by evolutionary theories gives us a common basis to cope with the problem. In short, what is proposed here is an outline of a sound defense of realism in Theology.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors will retain the copyright and grants to the journal the right of the first publication, with simultaneous license to the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this publication.
- Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on your personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase impact and citation published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
BIEVER, Celeste. Happy birthday boson! Six outstanding Higgs mysteries. New Scientist, 4 July 2013. Disponível em: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23810-happy-birthday-boson-six-outstanding-higgs-mysteries. Acesso em: 15 set. 2020.
BROCKMAN, J. (org.). Grandes ideias impossíveis de provar. Lisboa: Tinta da China, 2008.
BURKERT, W. A criação do sagrado. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2001.
CONSTRUTIVISMO. Wikipédia: a enciclopédia livre. [Flórida: Wikimedia Foundation, 2020]. Disponível em: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construtivismo. Acesso em: 15 set. 2020.
CRUZ, E. R. A epistemologia da Ciência da Religião: elementos para uma visão deflacionária. Interações, Belo Horizonte, Brasil, v. 13. n. 23, p. 14-22, jan./jul. 2018.
DUTRA, L. H. A. Introdução à Teoria da Ciência. 3. ed. Florianópolis: Editora da UFSC, 2009.
GLEISER, M. Sobre a realidade. Folha de São Paulo, 09 jun. 2013. Disponível em: https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/colunas/marcelogleiser/2013/06/1291952-sobre-a-realidade.shtml. Acesso em 15 set. 2020.
GLEISER, M. A ilha do conhecimento: os limites da ciência e a busca por sentido. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 2014.
HEBREUS. In: A BÍBLIA DE JERUSALÉM. Nova Edição. São Paulo: Paulus, 2002.
JOÃO. In: A BÍBLIA DE JERUSALÉM. Nova Edição. São Paulo: Paulus, 2002.
KHECHMOUNE, W. Blog. Oct. 15, 2013. Disponível em: https://plus.google.com/113376504911684406239/posts/Pd8sLXT2KEN. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2014. [conteúdo retirado da web, não mais disponível].
McMULLIN, E. Discernindo caminhos em Filosofia da Ciência: o contributo de meio século de estudos (1950-2000). Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, v. 63, n. 1-3, p. 67-91, 2007.
VERDADE. In: Wikipédia, a enciclopédia livre. [Flórida: Wikimedia Foundation, 2020]. Disponível em: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verdade. Acesso em: 15 set. 2020.
ZIMAN, J. Conhecimento confiável. Campinas: Ed. Papirus, 1996.