Continuing teacher training and educational measurement:

innovation in elite bilingual education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2358-3428.2023v27n60p101-131

Keywords:

educational measurement, continuing education of bilingual teachers, good education, innovation, autoethnography

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze how the educational measurement of a bilingual education system affects the lifelong learning education of bilingual teachers based on events in my daily work as a teacher trainer, working in private schools in the countryside of the state of São Paulo, linked to a bilingual education system, in a context called “elite bilingual” (CAVALCANTI, 1999). The discussion, part of an autoethnographic research (ADAMS, HOLMAN JONES & ELLIS, 2022) for a doctorate, starts from records in a field diary and events related to the educational measurement of the education system, embodied the analysis. As a theoretical-analytical device, Chang's (2016) autoethnographic precepts were observed, as well as the concept of good education (BIESTA, 2012), innovation and constellation of interrelated social practices (SIGNORINI, 2007). The results indicate that bilingual education systems expand based on the discourse that “you don't learn to speak English in school” and, accordingly, on the idea that “teachers don't know how to teach”. Still, educational measurement in the bilingual education system values ​​data that measure what is possible to measure, and not what is desirable in terms of good education. Thus, the existence of bilingual teaching systems and also the orientation based on the educational measurement that the systems carry out undermines the potential critical character of the continuing education of bilingual teachers, and becomes a space for confrontation between the expectations of different institutional agents involved in this structure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luana Mayer, Unicamp

Doutoranda em Linguística Aplicada pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas, mestre em Educação pela Universidade da Região de Joinviile (2020), possui graduação em Letras - Português e Inglês pela mesma universidade (2015).

References

ADAMS, Tony E; HOLMAN JONES, Stacey; ELLIS, Carolyn. Handbook of Autoethnography. 2nd Edition. Nova York: Routledge, 2022. 565p.

BAKER, C. Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (3rd ed.). Clevendon: Multilingual Matters LTD, 2001.

BIESTA, G. Boa educação na era da mensuração. Trad. Teresa Dias Carneiro. Cadernos de Pesquisa, v. 42, n. 147, p. 808-825, set./dez 2012.

BIESTA, G. What is Education For? On Good Education, Teacher Judgement, and Educational Professionalism. European Journal of Education, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2015

BOCHNER, A. P. Putting meanings into motion: sutoethnograpy’s existential calling. In:
JONES, S.; ADAMS, T. E.; ELLIS, C. (Orgs.). Handbook of autoethnography. Wallnut
Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 2013.

BOCHNER, Arthur P. Heart of the matter: a mini-manifesto for autoethnography. International Review of Qualitative Research, Vol. 10, No. 1, Spring 2017, pp. 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2017.10.1.67

CAVALCANTI, M. C. Estudos sobre educação bilíngue e escolarização em contextos de minorias linguísticas no Brasil. D.E.L.T.A, v. 15, p. 385-417, 1999.

CHANG, H. Autoethnography as method. Routledge, Nova York, 2016.

COPE, B. KALANTZIS, M. Towards Education Justice: A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies, Revisited. 2022. Rascunho. Disponível em: https://cgscholar.com/community/community_profiles/new-learning/community_updates/151465 Acesso em 05 jun. 2022

ELLIS, C. The ethnographic I: a methodological novel about autoethnography. EUA:
Altamira Press, 2004.

GARCÍA, O. Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Oxford:
Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.

GATTI, B; ANDRÉ, M. A Relevância dos Métodos de Pesquisa Qualitativa em Educação no Brasil. In: Metodologias da Pesquisa Qualitativa em Educação. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2010.

HOOKS, bell. Ensinamento pensamento crítico: sabedoria prática. Tradução Bhuvi Libanio. São Paulo: Elefante, 2020. 288 p.

MELLO, H. Educação bilíngue: uma breve discussão. Horizontes de Linguística Aplicada, v. 9, n.1, p. 118-140, 2010.

NEW LONDON GROUP (NLG). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), p.60-92, 1996.

ONO, F. T. P. D. A formação do formador de professores: uma pesquisa autoetnográfica na área de língua inglesa. 2017. 156f. Tese (Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da Universidade de São Paulo. Departamento de Letras Modernas. Área de concentração: Estudos Linguísticos e Literários em Inglês). Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo –SP.

KALANTZIS, Mary; COPE, Bill; PINHEIRO, Petrilson. Letramentos. Campinas, SP: Editora da Unicamp, 2020.

MEGALE, A. Bilingüismo e educação bilíngüe – discutindo conceitos. Revista Virtual de
Estudos da Linguagem – ReVEL. V. 3, n. 5, agosto de 2005.

SIGNORINI, I. (org). Significados da inovação no ensino de língua portuguesa e na formação de professores. Campinas, SP. Mercado de Letras, 2007.

STRECK, D. R. Pesquisar é pronunciar o mundo: notas sobre método e metodologia. In:
BRANDÃO, Carlos Rodrigues; STRECK, Danilo R. (Orgs.). Pesquisa participante: o saber da partilha. Aparecida, SP: Idéias e Letras. p. 259-276, 2006.

Published

2023-12-21

How to Cite

MAYER, Luana. Continuing teacher training and educational measurement: : innovation in elite bilingual education. Scripta, Belo Horizonte, v. 27, n. 60, p. 101–131, 2023. DOI: 10.5752/P.2358-3428.2023v27n60p101-131. Disponível em: https://periodicos.pucminas.br/scripta/article/view/30530. Acesso em: 21 oct. 2025.

Issue

Section

Eixo I. Políticas multilíngues, relações interculturais e formação