The Maze Task Mobile: Using a Psycholinguistic Experimental Technique as a Pedagogical Tool for Language Learning
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2358-3428.2023v27n59p118-147Mots-clés :
Maze task, Pedagogical tool, Mobile application, Linguistic training, Second language learningRésumé
This study presents a mobile application of the maze task as a complementary activity for second language learning. The application facilitates conducting linguistic training sessions with the maze task for both pedagogical and experimental purposes. We designed the Maze Task Mobile, used it in English classes with native speakers of Brazilian Portuguese, and analyzed student perceptions through an attitude survey. Besides presenting the application in detail, we discuss the results from the survey and from participants’ accuracy in the task highlighting the benefits of this first mobile version of the maze task as well as improvements needed for future development.
Téléchargements
Références
BENATI, A. Input manipulation, enhancement and processing: Theoretical views and empirical research. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, v. 6. n. 1. p. 65-88. 2016.
BENATI, A.; SCHWIETER, J. Pedagogical Interventions to L2 Grammar Instruction. In: SCHWIETER, J. and BENATI, A. (Eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. 477-499.
DEKEYSER, R. M. Skill Acquisition Theory. In: VANPATTEN, B. and WILLIAMS, J. (Eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction. New York: Routledge, 2015. 94-113.
ELLIS, N. C; WULFF, S. Usage-based approaches to SLA. In: VANPATTEN, B. and WILLIAMS, J. (Eds.), Second language acquisition research series: Theories in second language acquisition. New York: Routledge, 2015. 75-94.
ENKIN, E.; FORSTER, K. The Maze Task: Examining the Training Effect of Using a Psycholinguistic Experimental Technique for Second Language Learning. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching. v. 5. n. 2. p. 161-180. 2014.
FORSTER, K. Using a maze task to track lexical and sentence processing. The Mental Lexicon, v. 5. n. 3. p. 347-357. 2010.
FORSTER, K.; GUERRERA, C.; ELLIOT, L. The maze task: Measuring forced incremental. Behavior Research Methods, v. 41. n. 1. p. 163-171. 2009.
GASS, S. M.; MACKEY, A. Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In: VANPATTEN, B. and WILLIAMS, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2015. 180-206.
LIKERT, R. A technique for the measurements of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, v. 140. n. 22. p. 5-55. 1932.
POLIO, C.; LEE, J. Experimental Studies in L2 Classrooms. In: SCHWIETER, J. and BENATI, A. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. 137–165.
SMITH, M. Input Enhancement in Instructed SLA: Theoretical Bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, v. 15. n. 2. p. 165-179. 1993.
VANPATTEN, B. Input processing in adult SLA. In: VANPATTEN, B. and WILLIAMS, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2015. 113-135.
WITZEL, N.; WITZEL, J.; FORSTER, K. Comparisons of online reading paradigms: Eye tracking, moving-window, and maze. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, v. 41. n. 2. p. 105-128. 2012.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
DECLARATION DE DROIT D’AUTEUR
Les droits d’auteurs
L’envoie de toute collaboration implique, automatiquement, la cession complète des droits d’auteur à PUC Minas. Il est demandé aux auteurs d’assurer :
- l’inexistence de conflit d’intérêt (des relations entre auteurs, entreprises/institutions ou individus en ayant intérêt au thème traité par l’article), et
- des organismes ou institutions de subvention de recherche qui a donné origine à l’article.
