Code of Ethics
Dispositiva's Code of Ethics is inspired by scientific practices based on the principles of plurality, rigor and social commitments that guide the activities of the Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais and the Federal University of Minas Gerais, whose Post-Graduation Programs in Communication are responsible for the journal's publication. This Code of Ethics aims to guarantee good practices of scientific dissemination, open access and free of charge for publishing and reading, with commitments from all parties involved: authors, reviewers and editors. Our objective is that all people involved are committed to Dispositiva's editorial quality, ensuring that discriminatory practices of any nature, as well as plagiarism or self-plagiarism, are avoided. As part of the verification criteria for admissibility in the review stage, the articles will be submitted to a plagiarism detection software.
Ethical duties for authors
- To assure that the article has not been published and is not being reviewed for publication by another journal. If it has been presented at a scientific event, this information must be disclosed to the editorial team in the submission process.
- To assure that there is no plagiarism or self-plagiarism in submitted articles.
- To assure that there is no information that could make it possible to identify the article's authorship, ensuring the integrity of the double-blind peer review process.
- To verify that all bibliographical references effectively used in the article's basis have been duly and correctly informed.
- To cite recent and updated bibliographical references and consider a wide range of schools of thought.
- Do not misrepresent or falsify research data.
- To provide, when appropriate, open access to the data that was used in the article's writing.
- To ensure that all people involved in the article's writing are duly credited as authors.
- Do not include in the authorship any contribution that has not actually been made.
- To ensure that there are no conflicts of interest that may have influenced the methods and results of the analyses.
- To disclose the sources of research funding that allowed the article's production.
- To acknowledge, when submitting an article, that you hold the copyright to photographs or other images subject to copyright, or that you have obtained authorization for their use. Dispositiva is not responsible for improper use of photographs or images subject to copyright.
- To inform the editorial team of any theoretical, methodological or data processing and analysis errors detected at any time, during the review or after the article is published.
- To respond, within the appropriate deadlines, to any requests from the Dispositiva editorial team regarding the editorial flow, such as compliance with editorial standards, text corrections, etc.
Ethical duties for reviewers
- To comply with the deadlines indicated for accepting or refusing to review the article, as well as for returning the review, avoiding delays in communicating the decision to the authors and throughout the editorial process.
- To maintain confidentiality regarding the review, ensuring the principles of the double-blind peer review process.
- To assure, when agreeing to review an article, that there is no conflict of interest that could interfere with the result of the article's review.
- To notify Dispositiva's editorial team in case of plagiarism or any ethical problem identified in the article under review.
- Do not use any data contained in articles under review for personal benefit.
- To objectively review the articles, observing coherence, cohesion and relevance of theoretical and methodological bases, as well as respect for ethical principles of science, avoiding assessments that deviate from strictly scientific parameters.
- To provide a substantiated review that offers contributions to the article's authors.
Ethical duties for editors
- To ensure confidentiality at all stages of the editorial process and after the articles are published, in compliance with the principles of the double-blind peer review process.
- To adopt strictly scientific principles in accordance with Dispositiva's editorial standards and ethical guidelines when assessing the suitability of submitted articles in terms of their relevance to the journal's scope.
- To respect the principles of plurality of knowledge, avoiding prejudices of any nature.
- Do not use data contained in articles submitted for review for personal benefit.
- To enforce the deadlines set in calls for papers for Dispositiva's editions, ensuring that there are no delays or queues in the review and publication processes.
- To act in accordance with principles that prevent interference due to conflicts of interest.
- To ensure thematic compatibility when defining the article's reviewers.