Critical Discourse Analysis and Lexical Semantics:
an interdisciplinary interpreting of the US and China defense white papers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2022v10n2p96-117Keywords:
Identity, Defense Studies, Critical Discourse AnalysisAbstract
There have been new facets of multilateralism, which have motivated the realignment of traditional power relations established globally, especially regarding the United States and China. This new strategic environment can be observed in changes made to the Brazilian National Defense White Paper (LBDN) of 2020, as well as in the dialectic between white papers of the United States (2017), and China (2019). To investigate these realignments and their possible impacts on the Brazilian defense sector, the analysis was carried out in two phases: (1) analysis of the general characteristics of the Defense White Papers by the USA and China; and (2) comparison of discourses conveyed in chapters on international cooperation in each Defense White Paper. Speech patterns were analyzed according to rationales of Lexical Semantics and Critical Discourse Analysis. As a result, elements of semantic fields, intertextuality and modality in discourse were pointed out as parameters that could contribute to the evaluation of cooperation and deterrence/dissuasion actions to be adopted by the USA and China in the 21st century.
Downloads
References
ALMEIDA, F. S. P. A avaliação na linguagem: os elementos de atitude no discurso do professor – Um exercício em Análise do Discurso Sistêmico-Funcional. São Carlos: Pedro and João Publishing, 2010.
ANTHONY, L. AntConc Homepage. 2018. Available from : <http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/>. Access on: 27 Nov. 2020.
CASTELLS, M. O poder da identidade: a era da informação. v. 2. São Paulo/Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 2018.
CEPIK, M. A política da cooperação espacial chinesa: contexto estratégico e alcance internacional. Revista de Sociologia Política, v.19, supplementary number, p. 81-104, 2011.
CUNHA, G. L.; CABRAL, S. B.; QUEIROZ, F. A. de; KOSTIN, S. Uma releitura epistemológica das relações entre China e América Latina a partir do setor de Ciência Tecnologia e Inovação. REPATS – Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas Avançadas do Terceiro Setor, v. 5, n. 2 p. 739-763, 2018.
FAIRCLOUGH, N. Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge, 2003.
FAIRCLOUGH, N. Discurso e Mudança Social. Brasília: University of Brasilia, 2016.
HALLIDAY, M. A. K. An Introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold Publishers. London, Continunn. 1985.
L’HOMME, M. Lexical Semantics for Terminology: An introduction. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2020.
MAGALHÃES, I. Análise do Discurso Publicitário. Revista da ABRALIN, v. 4, n. 1 and 2, p. 231-260, 2005.
MAIER, F. De Obama a Trump: o contínuo da política cibernética estadunidense. Caderno de Relações Internacionais, v. 9, n.16, p. 109-138, 2018.
NOGUEIRA, A. Z. G. O papel de estados hegemônicos na provisão de bens públicos globais: uma abordagem em teoria dos jogos. Master’s thesis, University of Sao Paulo, 2019.
AUTHOR 2. Title. YEAR.
AUTHOR 2; XXXXXX. Title. YEAR.
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. China’s National Defense in the New Era. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 2019.
PONTES, R. M. A China na grande estratégia dos Estados Unidos da América: da contenção à histórica política de engajamento. Master’s thesis, State University of Campinas, 2020.
RESENDE, V. M.; RAMALHO, V. Análise de discurso crítica. São Paulo: Contexto, 2016.
SAID, E. Orientalismo: o Oriente como invenção do Ocidente. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1990.
SARAIVA, R.; AMARAL, T. O equilíbrio de poder no leste asiático e a reaproximação entre as Coreias: a mais recente fase de cooperação (2017-2018), Revista Conjuntura Austral, v. 10, n. 50, p. 5-25, 2019.
SILVA, T. T. da (Editor), Identidade e diferença: a perspectiva dos estudos culturais. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2014.
THOMPSON, J. Ideologia e cultura moderna: teoria social crítica na era dos meios de comunicação de massa. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2011.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. National Security Strategy of the United States of America .Washington D.C., 2017.
WOODWARD, K. Identidade e diferença: uma introdução teórica e conceitual. In: SILVA, T. T. da (Editor). Identidade e diferença: a perspectiva dos estudos culturais. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2014.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a.Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
b.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
![]()
