Multimodal analysis of metaphors in political-religious discourse: a cognitive-semiotic approach
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2358-3428.2016v20n40p119Mots-clés :
Cognitive Semiotics, Multimodal Semiotic Blending, Politicalreligious discourse, Brazilian politics, Legislative sessions.Résumé
This paper analyzes the interrelation between gestures and speech in the construction of multimodal metaphors in the “legislative session” genre. Based on Multimodal Semiotic Blending (MSB), an adaptation of Brandt and Brandt’s (2005) model (MIRANDA; MENDES, 2014; AVELAR, in press), an illustrative analysis of the multimodal metaphors found in the sessions was performed, focusing on the verbal and gestural resources used by the participants. To do so, five scenes were selected from two legislative
sessions performed by two so-called “Representative-pastors” of the Brazilian House of Representatives: Marco Feliciano and Silas Malafaia. Finally, the metaphors and the gestures performed by both politicians were compared. The conclusion reached in this study demonstrated how MSB can be relevant when analyzing the iconicity of material resources (mainly gestures) used by the participants.
Téléchargements
Références
AUCHLIN, A. Prosodic Iconicity and Experiential Blending. In: HANCIL, S. (Ed.) Prosody and Iconicity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2013. p. 1-31.
AVELAR, M. The emergence of multimodal metaphors in Brazilian politicalelectoral debates: a comparative analysis of the 2010 and 2014 second-round presidential debates. In: Zlatev , J; Konderak, P; Sonesson, G. (Eds.). Establishing Cognitive Semiotics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, in print.
Brandt, L.; Brandt, P. Making sense of a Blend. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, Amsterdam, v. 3, p. 216-249, 2005.
CIENKI, A. Why to study metaphor and gesture? IN: CIENKI, A.; MÜLLER, C. Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2008, p. 3-26
Kendon, A. Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
LAKOFF, G.; JOHNSON, M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, 2003. Original publicado em 1980.
Miranda, M.; Mendes, P. A emergência de metáforas multimodais: análise da metaforização e da compressão no debate político-eleitoral. Scripta, Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n.34, p. 237-256, 2014.
Müller, C.; Cienki, A. Words, gestures, and beyond: Forms of multimodal metaphor in the use of spoken language. In: Forceville, C.; Urios-Aparisi, E. (Org.) Multimodal metaphors. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009. p. 297-328.
TALMY, L. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Volume I: Concept Structuring System. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, 2000.
TURNER, M. Conceptual Integration. In: Geeraerts , D.; Cuyckens, H. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 377-393.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
DECLARATION DE DROIT D’AUTEUR
Les droits d’auteurs
L’envoie de toute collaboration implique, automatiquement, la cession complète des droits d’auteur à PUC Minas. Il est demandé aux auteurs d’assurer :
- l’inexistence de conflit d’intérêt (des relations entre auteurs, entreprises/institutions ou individus en ayant intérêt au thème traité par l’article), et
- des organismes ou institutions de subvention de recherche qui a donné origine à l’article.