Simulations and Pop Culture as tools to teach International Relations

Simulations and Pop Culture as tools to teach International Relations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2020v8n1p27-43

Keywords:

Simulations, Models, Pop Culture, Active Learning, Teaching, International Relations

Abstract

This article aims to introduce and discuss the possibilities arising from the use of the active learning strategies in International Relations courses in Brazil. It addresses the use of two strategies that would enrich the learning process of students. These are (i) the combination of nontraditional reading material, with emphasis on elements of pop culture, and (ii) the use of simulations and games in classroom. These elements would complement traditional teaching methods in at least three aspects. First, it leads students to situations they are familiar with. Second, it promotes the development of problem-solving ability based on the information and knowledge constituted in class. Finally, it builds meaningful connections between what is being studied and the reality that surrounds students. In that fashion, I suggest that such resources facilitate the development of a pedagogical environment with lasting results and, consequently, the emphasis on more by efficient learning tools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marcelo M. Valença, Escola de Guerra Naval

Doutor em Relações Internacionais (PUC-Rio). Professor Adjunto da Escola de Guerra Naval e do Programa de
Pós-Graduação em Estudos Marítimos (PPGEM), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Coordenador do Laboratório de Métodos
de Ensino Inovadores (LabMEI/EGN) e do Laboratório de Ensino e Pesquisa em Relações Internacionais.

References

• Asal, Victor. 2005. “Playing Games with International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 6: 359–73.

• Asal, Victor; Blake, Elizabeth L. Creating Simulations for Political Science Education. Journal of Political Science Education, v.2, n.1, 2006.

• Barr, Robert B, and John Tagg. 1995. “From Teaching to Learning: a New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education.” Change, 13–25. http://critical.tamucc.edu/~blalock/readings/tch2learn.htm.

• Baudot, Barbara. 2010. “Art in International Relations.” In The International Studies Encyclopedia, edited by Robert A Denemark, 1–15. Blackwell Publishing.

• Blanton, Robert G. 2012. “Zombies and International Relations: a Simple Guide for Bringing the Undead Into Your Classroom.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (1): 1–13.

• Bleiker, Roland. 2009. Aesthetics and World Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

• Burgan, Mary. 2006. “In Defense of Lecturing.” Change, no. November/December.

• Buzan, Barry. 2010. “America in Space: the International Relations of Star Trek and Battlestar Galactica” 39 (1). SAGE Publications: 175–80.

• Carter, Ralph G. 2010. “Teaching with Case Studies.” In The International Studies Encyclopedia, edited by Robert A Denemark, 1–12. Blackwell Publishing.

• Carvalho, Gustavo. 2013. “Virtual Worlds Can Be Dangerous: Using Ready-Made Computer Simulations for Teaching International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 15 (4): 538–57.

• Dale, Crispin, and John M Pymm. 2009. “Podagogy: the iPod as a Learning Technology.” Active Learning in Higher Education 10 (1): 84–96.

• Derian, Der, James, and Michael J Shapiro, eds. 1989. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. New York: Lexington Books.

• Drezner, Daniel W. 2015. Theories of International Politics and Zombies - Revived Edition. Princeton University Press.

• Engert, Stefan, and Alexander Spencer. 2009. “International Relations at the Movies: Teaching and Learning About International Politics Through Film.” Perspectives 17 (1): 83–104.

• Fishel, Stefanie, and Lauren Wilcox. 2017. “Politics of the Living Dead: Race and Exceptionalism in the Apocalypse,” 1–21.

• Grayson, Kyle, Matt Davies, and Simon Philpott. 2009. “Pop Goes IR? Researching the Popular Culture - World Politics Continuum.” Politics 29 (3): 155–63.

• Heath-Kelly, Charlotte, and Lee Jarvis. 2017. “Affecting Terrorism: Laughter, Lamentation, and Detestation as Drives to Terrorism Knowledge.” International Political Sociology, 1–18.

• Inoue, Cristina Yumie Aoki, and Matthew Krain. 2014. “One World, Two Classrooms, Thirteen Days: Film as an Active-Teaching and Learning Tool in Cross-National Perspective.” Journal of Political Science Education 10 (4): 424–42.

• Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2010. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. Londres e New York: Routledge.

• Kember, David, Amber Ho, and Celina Hong. 2008. “The Importance of Establishing Relevance in Motivating Student Learning.” Active Learning in Higher Education 9 (3): 249–63.

• Kille, Kent J. 2002. “Simulating the Creation of a New International Human Rights Treaty: Active Learning in the International Studies Classroom.” International Studies Perspectives 3 (3): 271–90.

• Kille, Kent J, Matthew Krain, and Jeffrey S Lantis. 2008. “Active Learning Across Borders: Lessons From an Interactive Workshop in Brazil.” International Studies Perspectives 9 (4): 411–29.

• Kille, Kent J, Matthew Krain, and Jeffrey S Lantis. 2010. “The State of the Active Teaching and Learning Literature.” In The International Studies Encyclopedia, 1–18. Blackwell Publishing.

• Krain, Matthew, Kent J Kille, and Jeffrey S Lantis. 2014. “Active Teaching and Learning in Cross-National Perspective.” International Studies Perspectives 16 (2): 142–55.

• Lean, Jonathan, Jonathan Moizer, Michael Towler, and Caroline Abbey. 2006. “Simulations and Games: Use and Barriers in Higher Education.” Active Learning in Higher Education 7 (3): 227–42.

• Lebow, Richard Ned. 2000. “What's So Different About a Counterfactual?.” World Politics 52 (4): 550–85.

• Neumann, Iver B., and Daniel H Nexon. 2006. “Introduction: Harry Potter and the Study of World Politics.” In, edited by Daniel H Nexon and Iver B. Neumann, 1–14. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, and Oxford.

• Powner, Leanne C, and Michelle G Allendoerfer. 2008. “Evaluating Hypotheses About Active Learning.” International Studies Perspectives 9 (1): 75–89.

• Ramanzini Júnior, Haroldo, and Thiago Lima. 2017. “Editorial - Challenges and Pathways of Teaching, Research and Extension in International Relations in Brazil.” Meridiano 47 - Journal of Global Studies 18: 1–5.

• Reeves, Julie. 2004. Culture and International Relations: Narratives, Natives, and Tourists. Londres: Routledge.

• Saideman, Stephen M. 2013. “Pop Prisoner’s Dilemma.” Political Violence at a Glance. April 23. http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2013/04/23/pop-prisoners-dilemma/.

• Saunders, Robert A, and Jack Holland. 2017. “The Ritual of Beer Consumption as Discursive Intervention: Effigy, Sensory Politics, and Resistance in Everyday IR” 46 (2): 119–41.

• Shapiro, Michael J. 2004. Methods and Nations: Cultural Governance and the Indigenous Subject. New York: Routledge.

• Tetlock, Philip E, and Aaron Belkin. 1996. “Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics.” In Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics, edited by Philip E Tetlock and Aaron Belkin, 3–38. Princeton.

• Tierney, Michael J. 2007. “Schoolhouse Rock: Pedagogy, Politics, and Pop.” International Studies Perspectives 8 (1): iii–v.

• Valença, Marcelo M. 2012. “Combinando Teoria E Prática Na Criação De Um Programa: Experiências Em Um Curso De Guerra E Paz.” Política Hoje 20 (1): 253–79.

• Valença, Marcelo M, and Cristina Yumie Aoki Inoue. 2017. “Contribuições Do Aprendizado Ativo Ao Estudo Das Relações Internacionais Nas Universidades Brasileiras.” Meridiano 47 - Journal of Global Studies 18 (September): 1–15.

• Wang, Ningchuan. 2014. “The Currency of Fantasy: Discourses of Popular Culture in International Relations.” International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal 15 (1): 1–13.

• Zagare, Frank C, and Branislav L Slantchev. 2010. “Game Theory and Other Modeling Approaches.” In The International Studies Encyclopedia, edited by Robert A Denemark, 1–16. Blackwell Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-24

How to Cite

Valença, M. M. (2020). Simulations and Pop Culture as tools to teach International Relations: Simulations and Pop Culture as tools to teach International Relations. Estudos Internacionais: International Relations Journal of PUC Minas, 8(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2020v8n1p27-43

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): ESTUDOS INTERNACIONAIS - ABRIL

Section

Artigos

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a.Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal 

b.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).