El uso de las simulaciones y de la cultura popular en la educación de las Relaciones Internacionales

Simulations and Pop Culture as tools to teach International Relations

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2020v8n1p27-43

Palabras clave:

Simulaciones, Cultura popular, Aprendizaje, Activo, Enseñanza, Relaciones Internacionales

Resumen

El presente artículo presenta y discute las posibilidades derivadas de la utilización del instrumental de aprendizaje activo en los cursos de Relaciones Internacionales en Brasil. Mas específicamente, aborda el uso de las dos estrategias que enriquecerían el proceso de aprendizaje. Estas son el resultado de la combinación del recurso a materiales de lectura non tradicionales, con énfasis en elementos de la cultura popular, y el desenvolvimiento de simulaciones y juegos en salón de clase. Estos elementos complementarían la enseñanza tradicional al menos en dos puntos: En primer lugar, por presentar situaciones familiares a los estudiantes y, en segundo, por iniciarse a partir del estimulo al desenvolvimiento de la habilidad de solución de problemas basado en un conocimiento constituido. Finalmente, por construir conexiones significativas entre lo que es estudiado y la realidad que rodea a los estudiantes. De este modo, sugerimos que estos
recursos posibilitan y facilitan la constitución de un ambiente pedagógico con resultados duraderos y, por consecuencia, la oferta de herramientas màs eficientes para el aprendizaje del alumno.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Marcelo M. Valença, Escola de Guerra Naval

Doutor em Relações Internacionais (PUC-Rio). Professor Adjunto da Escola de Guerra Naval e do Programa de
Pós-Graduação em Estudos Marítimos (PPGEM), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Coordenador do Laboratório de Métodos
de Ensino Inovadores (LabMEI/EGN) e do Laboratório de Ensino e Pesquisa em Relações Internacionais.

Citas

• Asal, Victor. 2005. “Playing Games with International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 6: 359–73.

• Asal, Victor; Blake, Elizabeth L. Creating Simulations for Political Science Education. Journal of Political Science Education, v.2, n.1, 2006.

• Barr, Robert B, and John Tagg. 1995. “From Teaching to Learning: a New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education.” Change, 13–25. http://critical.tamucc.edu/~blalock/readings/tch2learn.htm.

• Baudot, Barbara. 2010. “Art in International Relations.” In The International Studies Encyclopedia, edited by Robert A Denemark, 1–15. Blackwell Publishing.

• Blanton, Robert G. 2012. “Zombies and International Relations: a Simple Guide for Bringing the Undead Into Your Classroom.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (1): 1–13.

• Bleiker, Roland. 2009. Aesthetics and World Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

• Burgan, Mary. 2006. “In Defense of Lecturing.” Change, no. November/December.

• Buzan, Barry. 2010. “America in Space: the International Relations of Star Trek and Battlestar Galactica” 39 (1). SAGE Publications: 175–80.

• Carter, Ralph G. 2010. “Teaching with Case Studies.” In The International Studies Encyclopedia, edited by Robert A Denemark, 1–12. Blackwell Publishing.

• Carvalho, Gustavo. 2013. “Virtual Worlds Can Be Dangerous: Using Ready-Made Computer Simulations for Teaching International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 15 (4): 538–57.

• Dale, Crispin, and John M Pymm. 2009. “Podagogy: the iPod as a Learning Technology.” Active Learning in Higher Education 10 (1): 84–96.

• Derian, Der, James, and Michael J Shapiro, eds. 1989. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. New York: Lexington Books.

• Drezner, Daniel W. 2015. Theories of International Politics and Zombies - Revived Edition. Princeton University Press.

• Engert, Stefan, and Alexander Spencer. 2009. “International Relations at the Movies: Teaching and Learning About International Politics Through Film.” Perspectives 17 (1): 83–104.

• Fishel, Stefanie, and Lauren Wilcox. 2017. “Politics of the Living Dead: Race and Exceptionalism in the Apocalypse,” 1–21.

• Grayson, Kyle, Matt Davies, and Simon Philpott. 2009. “Pop Goes IR? Researching the Popular Culture - World Politics Continuum.” Politics 29 (3): 155–63.

• Heath-Kelly, Charlotte, and Lee Jarvis. 2017. “Affecting Terrorism: Laughter, Lamentation, and Detestation as Drives to Terrorism Knowledge.” International Political Sociology, 1–18.

• Inoue, Cristina Yumie Aoki, and Matthew Krain. 2014. “One World, Two Classrooms, Thirteen Days: Film as an Active-Teaching and Learning Tool in Cross-National Perspective.” Journal of Political Science Education 10 (4): 424–42.

• Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2010. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. Londres e New York: Routledge.

• Kember, David, Amber Ho, and Celina Hong. 2008. “The Importance of Establishing Relevance in Motivating Student Learning.” Active Learning in Higher Education 9 (3): 249–63.

• Kille, Kent J. 2002. “Simulating the Creation of a New International Human Rights Treaty: Active Learning in the International Studies Classroom.” International Studies Perspectives 3 (3): 271–90.

• Kille, Kent J, Matthew Krain, and Jeffrey S Lantis. 2008. “Active Learning Across Borders: Lessons From an Interactive Workshop in Brazil.” International Studies Perspectives 9 (4): 411–29.

• Kille, Kent J, Matthew Krain, and Jeffrey S Lantis. 2010. “The State of the Active Teaching and Learning Literature.” In The International Studies Encyclopedia, 1–18. Blackwell Publishing.

• Krain, Matthew, Kent J Kille, and Jeffrey S Lantis. 2014. “Active Teaching and Learning in Cross-National Perspective.” International Studies Perspectives 16 (2): 142–55.

• Lean, Jonathan, Jonathan Moizer, Michael Towler, and Caroline Abbey. 2006. “Simulations and Games: Use and Barriers in Higher Education.” Active Learning in Higher Education 7 (3): 227–42.

• Lebow, Richard Ned. 2000. “What's So Different About a Counterfactual?.” World Politics 52 (4): 550–85.

• Neumann, Iver B., and Daniel H Nexon. 2006. “Introduction: Harry Potter and the Study of World Politics.” In, edited by Daniel H Nexon and Iver B. Neumann, 1–14. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, and Oxford.

• Powner, Leanne C, and Michelle G Allendoerfer. 2008. “Evaluating Hypotheses About Active Learning.” International Studies Perspectives 9 (1): 75–89.

• Ramanzini Júnior, Haroldo, and Thiago Lima. 2017. “Editorial - Challenges and Pathways of Teaching, Research and Extension in International Relations in Brazil.” Meridiano 47 - Journal of Global Studies 18: 1–5.

• Reeves, Julie. 2004. Culture and International Relations: Narratives, Natives, and Tourists. Londres: Routledge.

• Saideman, Stephen M. 2013. “Pop Prisoner’s Dilemma.” Political Violence at a Glance. April 23. http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2013/04/23/pop-prisoners-dilemma/.

• Saunders, Robert A, and Jack Holland. 2017. “The Ritual of Beer Consumption as Discursive Intervention: Effigy, Sensory Politics, and Resistance in Everyday IR” 46 (2): 119–41.

• Shapiro, Michael J. 2004. Methods and Nations: Cultural Governance and the Indigenous Subject. New York: Routledge.

• Tetlock, Philip E, and Aaron Belkin. 1996. “Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics.” In Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics, edited by Philip E Tetlock and Aaron Belkin, 3–38. Princeton.

• Tierney, Michael J. 2007. “Schoolhouse Rock: Pedagogy, Politics, and Pop.” International Studies Perspectives 8 (1): iii–v.

• Valença, Marcelo M. 2012. “Combinando Teoria E Prática Na Criação De Um Programa: Experiências Em Um Curso De Guerra E Paz.” Política Hoje 20 (1): 253–79.

• Valença, Marcelo M, and Cristina Yumie Aoki Inoue. 2017. “Contribuições Do Aprendizado Ativo Ao Estudo Das Relações Internacionais Nas Universidades Brasileiras.” Meridiano 47 - Journal of Global Studies 18 (September): 1–15.

• Wang, Ningchuan. 2014. “The Currency of Fantasy: Discourses of Popular Culture in International Relations.” International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal 15 (1): 1–13.

• Zagare, Frank C, and Branislav L Slantchev. 2010. “Game Theory and Other Modeling Approaches.” In The International Studies Encyclopedia, edited by Robert A Denemark, 1–16. Blackwell Publishing.

Descargas

Publicado

2020-04-24

Cómo citar

Valença, M. M. (2020). El uso de las simulaciones y de la cultura popular en la educación de las Relaciones Internacionales: Simulations and Pop Culture as tools to teach International Relations. Estudos Internacionais: Revista De Relações Internacionais Da PUC Minas, 8(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2020v8n1p27-43

Número

Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2020): ESTUDOS INTERNACIONAIS - ABRIL

Sección

Artigos

Licencia

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

1. Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

2.Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

3.Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).