NATO’s institutional change in the post-Cold War

an analysis on the evolution of the Strategic Concept in the perspective of Mahoney and Thelen’s model

Authors

  • Vlademir Monteiro UFPE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2021v9n2p132-152

Keywords:

Institutional chance, NATO, Strategic Concept

Abstract

This article addresses the impact of the post-Cold War reformulation of the Strategic Concept on NATO’s normative framework. The Strategic Concept prescribes the norms and practices that guide the organization’s conduct. Since the dismantling of the bipolar order, three such documents have been drawn
up - one in 1991, another in 1999 and the most recent in 2010, and each of them have introduced new features regarding the scope and area of action of the Atlantic Alliance, while also preserving others rules. In view of the above, this piece of work intends to explain this process from the perspective of Mahoney and Thelen’s study about institutional change. The main purpose is to analyze how the SC impacts the organization evolution and how the interests conflicts shapes the SC content and type of the change. In methodological terms, the work is structured as a single case study, which uses the examination of official documents and the use of secondary sources. Among its findings, the article finds out the NATO’s trajectory of chance is marked by the reformulations over its functions and widening of its geographic reach. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vlademir Monteiro, UFPE

Doutorando no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Política da UFPE. Residente em João Pessoa,
Brasil. Membro do Núcleo de Estudos Americanos e do Grupo de Pesquisa em Estudos Estratégicos e Segurança Internacional. Áreas de interesse: Segurança Internacional, Teoria das RI, Oriente Médio. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2800-6194

References

BURTON, J. NATO’s durability in a post-Cold War world. Albany: State University of New York, 2018.
DENI, J. Alliance management and maintenance: restructuring NATO for the 21st century. Hampshire: Ashgate, 2007.
FRANTZEN, H. NATO and peace support operations 1991-1999: policies and doctrines. Oxon: Frank Cass, 2005.
GHECIU, A. NATO in the New Europe: the politics of international socializations after the Cold War. Sandford: Stanford University Press, 2005.
GLASER, C. Realists as optmistis: cooperation as self-help. International Security, v. 19, n. 3, p. 50-90, 1994.
GRIECO, J. Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique if the newest liberal institutionalist. International Organization, v. 42, n. 3, pp. 485-507, 1988
KAY, S. NATO and the United States. In PAPACOSMA, V; HEISS, M. (eds), NATO in the post-Cold War era: does it have a future. Hampshire: MacMillan Press, 1995, p. 151-178.
KEOHANE, R. After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princepton: Princepton University Press, 1984.
KEOHANE, R.; MARTIN, L. The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security, v. 20, n. 1, p. 39-51, 1995.
MAHONEY, J; THELEN, K. A theory of gradual institutional change. In MAHONEY, J; THELEN, K. (eds). Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
MEARSHEIMER, J. Back to the future: instabilbity in Europe after the Cold War. International Security, v. 15, n. 1, p. 5-56, 1990.
MEARSHEIMER, J. The false promise of international institutions. International Security, v. 19, n. 3, p. 5-49, 1994.
MOORE, R. NATO's new mission: projecting stability in a post-Cold War world. Westport: Praeger, 2007.
NOETZEL, T; SCHREER, B. Does a multi-tier NATO matter? The Atlantic allaince and the process of strategic change. International Affairs, v. 85, n. 2, p. 211-226, 2009.
OYE, K. Explaining cooperation under anarchy: hypothesis and strategies. World Politics, v. 38, n. 1, p. 1-24, 1985
OTAN. Address to the North Atlantic Council. OTAN, Bruxelas, abr. 1989. Disponível em:< https://www.nato.int/docu/speech/1989/s890404a_e.htm >. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2020
OTAN. The North Atlantic Treaty. OTAN, Washington, abr. 1949. Disponível em: <https://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/stock_publications/20120822_nato_treaty_en_light_2009.pdf>. Acesso em 15 mar. 2020.
OTAN. The Strategic Concept for the Defence of the North Atlantic Area. OTAN, Washington, dec. 1949. Disponível em: <https://www.nato.int/docu/stratdoc/eng/a491201a.pdf>. Acesso em 15 mar. 2020.
OTAN. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization Medium Term Plan. OTAN, abr. 1950. Disponível em: < https://www.nato.int/docu/stratdoc/eng/a500328d.pdf>. Acesso em 15 mar. 2020
OTAN. The Alliance's New Strategic Concept. Londres. OTAN, nov. 1991. Disponível em: <https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_23847.htm>. Acesso em 15 mar. 2020.
OTAN. The Alliance's Strategic Concept. OTAN, Washington, abr. 1999. Disponível em: <https://www.nato.int/cps/ie/natohq/official_texts_27433.htm>. Acesso em 15 mar. 2020.
OTAN. Strategic Concept 'Active Engagement, Modern Defence. OTAN, Lisboa, nov. 2010. Disponível em: <https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_publications/20120214_strategic-concept-2010-eng.pdf>. Acesso em 15 mar. 2020.
OTAN. Consensus decision-making at NATO. OTAN, Bruxelas. Disponível em: <https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_49178.htm?selectedLocale=en>. Acesso em 15 mar. 2020.
SMITH, M. NATO in the first decade after the Cold War. Sandhurst: Springer, 2000.
SMITH, M. Afghanistan in context: NATO out-of-area debates in the 1990s. UNISCI, Madrid, jan. 2010. Disponível em:< https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/767/76712438003.pdf >. Acesso em 15 mar. 2020.
STROMSEHT, J. The North Atlantic Treaty and European Securitu after the Cold War. Cornell International Law Jorunal, 24(3), pp. 479-502, 1991
WALT, S. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca : Cornell Univeristy Press. 1987.
WALTZ, K. Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison Wesley Publishing Company. 1979.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-28

How to Cite

Monteiro, V. (2021). NATO’s institutional change in the post-Cold War: an analysis on the evolution of the Strategic Concept in the perspective of Mahoney and Thelen’s model. Estudos Internacionais: International Relations Journal of PUC Minas, 9(2), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2021v9n2p132-152

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): ESTUDOS INTERNACIONAIS - JULHO

Section

Artigos

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a.Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal 

b.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).