Uncle Sam looking toward Brazil
representations of US think tanks regarding Brazil’s international performance in the BRICS (2009-2016)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2021v9n2p57-76Keywords:
BRICS, Think tanks, Brazilian Foreign Policy, Constructivism, Content analysisAbstract
This article analyzes the representations of the American think tanks respect for the international performance of Brazil through the BRICS during the presidencies of Lula da Silva and Dilma Rousseff. Between the years 2003 to 2016, Brazil developed a foreign policy aimed at the top of its international relevance. As one of the central strategies used to increase its participation in the main multilateral decisions, as well as making Sul Global a leader, the country involved in the formation of new coalitions with other intermediate/emerging countries, among them or the BRICS. Making a major innovation in international relations at the beginning of the 21st century, a coalition BRICS has become a reference to the identification of intentions and the potential for influence of these new actors in the international system. In this context, the searchers recognize which are the strategic options in relation to the performance in Brazil through the BRICS circulating in the political environment of the US, particularly with the think tanks. From the analysis of the verifiable content that, for a great majority of writers, Brazil was defined as an actor with little commitment to the maintenance of the order. According to this view, Brazil questions the position of the US and acts alongside countries that violate human rights and democracy.
Downloads
References
BROMUND, Ted. Problems Brewing for the BRICs. Heritage Foundation, Washington, DC, 2 nov. 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.heritage.org/trade/commentary/problems-brewing-the-brics>. Acesso em: 25 maio 2016.
CAMPBELL, John. 2013. Brazil in Africa. Council on Foreign Relations, Washington, DC, 1 maio 2013. Disponível em: <https://www.cfr.org/blog/brazil-africa-0>. Acesso em: 15 maio 2016.
COLEMAN, Isabel. Foreign Aid III: BRICS as Donors. Council on Foreign Relations, Washington, DC, 20 abri. 2012. Disponível em: <https://www.cfr.org/coleman/category/topics/economic-development/page/7/> Acesso em: 15 maio 2016.
FINNEMORE, Martha. National interests in international society. Cornell University Press, 1996.
FISHLOW, Albert. Starting Over: Brazil Since 1985. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2011.
GAYOU, Gerard. BRICS Bank: More Problems Than Potential. The Daily Signal, Washington, DC, 22 jul 2014. Disponível em: <http://dailysignal.com/2014/07/22/brics-bank-problems-potential/>. Acesso em: 25 maio 2016.
HOPF, Ted. Social construction of international politics: identities e foreign policies, Moscow, 1995 e 1999. New York: Cornell University Press, 2002.
JAFFRELOT, Christophe. Under a Southern Sun. Carnegie Endowment International for Peace, Washington, DC, abri. 2013. Disponível em: <http://carnegieendowment.org/2013/04/01/under-southern-sun-pub-51365>. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2016.
JONES, Bruce. The BRICS Summit: A shadow of the former self it never was. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, July 7, 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/orderfromchaos/posts/2015/07/07bricssummitufajones>. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2016.
JONES, Bruce; WRIGHT, Thomas. The BRICS Safety Net. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, July 17, 2014. Disponível em: < https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2014/07/17/the-brics-safety-net/>. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2016.
KAHN, Robert. BRICS and Mortals. Council on Foreign Relations, Washington, DC, 15 jul 2014. Disponível em: <https://www.cfr.org/blog/brics-and-mortals>. Acesso em: 18 maio 2016.
KASSENOVA, Togzhan. Brazil’s Nuclear Kaleidoscope: An Evolving Identity. Carnegie Endowment International for Peace, Washington, DC: Washington, DC, mar. 2014. Disponível em: <http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/03/12/brazil-s-nuclear-kaleidoscope-evolving-identity-pub-54832>. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2016.
KLIMAN, Daniel M.; FONTAINE, Richard. Global Swing States: Brazil, India, Indonesia, Turkey and the Future of International Order. Center for a New American Security, 2012. Disponível em: <www.cnas.org/files/.../CNAS_GlobalSwingStates_KlimanFontaine.pdf>. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2015.
KORNEGAY, Francis; BOHLER-MULLER, Narnia (Orgs). Laying the Brics of a New Global Order. from Yekaterinburg 2009 to Ethekwini 2013.
KURLANTZICK, Joshua. Don't Bet on the BRICs. Council on Foreign Relations, Washington, DC, 7 nov. 2011. Disponível em: <https://www.cfr.org/blog/dont-bet-brics>. Acesso em: 18 maio 2016.
LINN, Johannes F. Realizing the Potential of the Multilateral Development Banks. Brookings Institution, Financing for Investment Article, 5 set. 2013. Acesso em: 24 mar. 2016.
LINS DA SILVA, Carlos Eduardo. The New Development Bank adds substance to the BRICS. Wilson Center, Washington, DC, July 30, 2014. Disponível em: <https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/thenewdevelopmentbankaddssubstancetothebric> Acesso em: 24 mar. 2016.
MARES, DAVID; TRINKUNAS, HAROLD. Aspirational power: Brazil on the long road to global influence. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2016.
McGANN, James & WEAVER, Kent. Think tanks and civil societies: catalysts for ideas and action. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2000.
MEDVETZ, Thomas. Think Tanks in America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2012.
NAÍM, Moisés. BRICs. Washington, DC, May 1, 2014. Carnegie Endowment International for Peace. Disponível em: <http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/05/01/brics/ha0k>. Acesso em: 16 maio 2016.
NORIEGA, Roger, FOGASSA, Marc. Brazil Is in a Class By Itself. American Enterprise Institution, Washington, DC, 19 mar. 2011. Disponível em: <http://www.aei.org/publication/brazil-is-in-a-class-by-itself/>. Acesso em: 24 mar. 2016.
O’NEIL, Shannon. Brazil as an Emerging Power: The View from the United States. Council on Foreign Relations, Washington, DC, 1 mar. 2010. Disponível em: <https://www.cfr.org/blog/brazil-emerging-power-view-united-states>. Acesso em: 16 maio 2016.
OLSON, Ryan; WOES, Amid. Emerging Markets Need More Economic Freedom. The Daily Signal, Washington, DC, 28 jan. 2014. Disponível em: <http://dailysignal.com/2014/01/28/amid-woes-emerging-markets-need-economic-freedom/>. Acesso em: 25 maio 2016.
PATRICK, Stewart M. The BRICS India Summit: Beyond Bricolage? Council on Foreign Relations, Washington, DC, 28 mar. 2012. Disponível em: <https://www.cfr.org/blog/brics-india-summit-beyond-bricolage>. Acesso em: 18 maio 2016.
PECEQUILO, Cristina Soreanu. Os Estados Unidos e o Século XXI. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2013.
PECEQUILO, Cristina. O Brasil e a América do Sul: relações regionais e globais. Rio de Janeiro: Alta Books, 2015.
PETTIS, Michael. It Would Be Foolish for the BRICs to Save Europe. Carnegie Endowment International for Peace, Washington, DC, 6 out. 2011. Disponível em: <http://carnegieendowment.org/2011/10/06/it-would-be-foolish-for-brics-to-save-europe-pub-45690 >. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2016.
PICCONE, Ted. Obama, Rousseff, and the crucible of human Rights. Brookings Institution, Ordem from Chaos, Washington, DC, 26 jun. 2015. Disponível em: <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2015/06/26/obama-rousseff-and-the-crucible-of-human-rights/>. Acesso em: 23 abri. 2016.
ROBERTS, James. Declining Economic Freedom and Growing Statism: The BRICs Are Hitting the Wall. The Daily Signal, Washington, DC, 3 de fev. de 2013. Disponível em: <http://dailysignal.com/2013/02/15/declining-economic-freedom-and-growing-statism-the-brics-are-hitting-the-wall/>. Acesso em: 25 maio 2016.
ROHAC, Dalibor; SCHMITT, Gary. Laying BRICS: A not-so-happy future. American Enterprise Institution, Washington, DC, January 5, 2016. Disponível em: <https://www.aei.org/publication/laying-brics-a-not-so-happy-future/>. Acesso em 18 de maio 2016.
SMITH, James. The Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and the Rise of the New Policy Elite. New York: Free Press, 1991.
STONE, Daiane and DENHAM, Andrew (eds.). Think tank traditions: policy research and the politics of ideas. Manchester: Manchester university Press, 2004.
STUNKEL, Oliver. BRICS e o future da ordem global. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Paz e Terra, 2017.
SWEIG, Julia. Desconsiderar os Brics ou não? Folha de São Paulo, 16 jul. 2014. Disponível em: <http://m.folha.uol.com.br/colunas/juliasweig/2014/07/1486590-desconsiderar-os-brics-ou-nao.shtml?mobile>. Acesso em: 18 maio 2016.
TRINKUNAS, Harold. Brazil's Global Ambitions. Americas Quarterly Article, Washington, DC, 4 fev. 2015.
VEZIRGIANNIDOU, Sevasti-Eleni. The United States and the rising powers in a post-hegemonic global order. International Affairs, 89: 3 (2013) 635-651.
WIETCHIKOSKI, Luciana. A atuação internacional do Brasil no século XXI: as visões dos principais think tanks estadunidenses (2003-2016). 2018. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência Política) – Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas da Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, 2018.
WOODROW WILSON CENTER FOR SCHOLARS. BRICS: Shaping the New Global Architecture. (1h16min17s) 28 jun. 2011. Wilson Center, jun. 2011. Disponível em: <https://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/brics-shaping-the-new-global-architecture>. Acesso em: 22 jan. 2017.i
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a.Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
b.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).