A busca por segurança ontológica como fundamento da política externa da Rússia em resposta à crise na Ucrânia (1999-2021)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2024v12n2p108-125Keywords:
Crise da Ucrânia, política externa russa, segurança ontológicaAbstract
The article aims to analyze the foundation of Russia's foreign policy in response to the Ukraine crisis through the concept of ontological security. The ontological sphere is as important for state security as the physical one, to the point that it can be prioritized to the detriment of the latter in favor of the maintenance of the sense of identity, which is built through routinized relationships with relevant actors and a coherent biographical narrative. In methodological terms, this is a descriptive exploratory study that uses the dominant narrative analysis of official documents and speeches to understand the motives and interests of Russian behavior. The findings suggest that, in addition to the physical threat and geopolitical importance of the region, the post-Soviet space, particularly Ukraine, appears to integrate an imagined geography inextricably linked to Russian history, allowing the coherence of its biographical narrative after the disintegration of the USSR and exposing the need to ontological security-seeking. Despite shared historical and ethnic ties, the idea of a distinct Ukrainian nationality is seen as the result of nationalist politics, which has been co-opted by the West to constrain Russian capabilities and influence.
Downloads
References
BAYLY, M. J. Imperial ontological (in)security: ‘Buffer states, International Relations and the case of Anglo-Afghan relations, 1808–1878. European Journal of International Relations, v. 21, n. 4, p. 816–840, 2015.
BBC. Ukraine crisis: Timeline. [S.l.: s.n], 13 nov. 2014.
BERENSKOETTER, F. Parameters of a national biography. European Journal of International Relations, vol. 20, n. 1, p. 262–288, 2014.
BIGG, M. M. A timeline of the tensions between Russia and Ukraine. The New York Times. [S.l.: s.n], 18 fev. 2022.
BUNDE, T. Unquiet on the Eastern Flank. In: BUNDE, T. et al. Munich Security Report 2022. Munich: Munich Security Conference, fev. 2022.
BURKHARDT, F. The Putin System. In: DEKODER; FSO. Putin: 20 years. Dekoder, [S.l.: s.n.], 2020.
CAMPOS, F. L. S.; LOBO, I; AZEVEDO, B. M. O ocidente como responsável pelas crises da Ucrânia e da Geórgia. Rev. Bras. Est. Def. v. 5, nº 2, p. 113-136, jul./dez. 2018.
CASULA, P. Russia’s Foreign Policy from the Crimean Crisis to the Middle East: Great Power Gamble or Biopolitics? Rising Powers Quarterly, v. 2, n. 1, p. 27–51, 2017.
CHALLIS, B. Narrating Ukraine: A Crisis of Russian Identity? DGSi Working Paper, n. 3, Durham: Durham Global Security Institute, 2016. Disponível em: www.dur.ac.uk/dgsi/. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2021.
CLUNAN, A. The Social Construction of Russia’s Resurgence: Aspirations, Identity and Security Interests. New York: John Hopkins University Press, 2009
CUPAĆ, J. The Anxiety Dilemma: Locating the Western Balkans in the Age of Anxiety. Journal of Regional Security, vol. 15, n. 1, p. 7-38, 2020.
DEKODER; ZOIS; FSO. Speech of Vladimir Putin. In: The Crimean Archipelago, [S.l.: s.n], 2019.
DELEHANTY, Will, K.; STEELE, Brent J. Engaging the narrative in ontological (in)security theory: insights from feminist IR. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 22, n.3, 2009, p. 523-540.
EBERLE, J; HANDL, V. Ontological Security, Civilian Power, and German Foreign Policy Toward Russia. Foreign Policy Analisys. 2018, p. 1-18.
EJDUS, F. Critical situations, fundamental questions and ontological insecurity in world politics. Journal of International Relations and Development, v. 21, p. 883-908, 2018.
FREIRE, M. R. Política externa russa no «interméstico»: uma abordagem construtivista. Relações Internacionais, n. 55, p. 35–49, set. 2017.
HANSEN, F. S. Russia’s relations with the West: ontological security through conflict. Contemporary Politics, v. 22, n. 3, p. 359–375, 2 jul. 2016.
HANSEN, L. Security as Practice. London: Routledge, 2006.
HOPF, T. Identity, legitimacy, and the use of military force: Russia’s Great Power identities and military intervention in Abkhazia. Review of International Studies, v. 31, p. 225–243, 2005.
KARKLIS, L.; MELLEN, R. Four maps that explain the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The Washington Post, 21.jan.2022.
KAZHARSKI, A. Civilizations as Ontological Security?: Stories of the Russian Trauma. Problems of Post-Communism, v. 67, n. 1, p. 24–36, 2 jan. 2020.
KAZHARSKI, A.; KUBOVÁ, M. Belarus as a liminal space for Russia’s ontological security before and after the 2020 protests. New Perspectives, 22 jul. 2021.
KUZIO, T. Historiography and National Identity among the Eastern1Slavs: Towards a New Framework. National Identities, vol.3, n. 2, 2001, p. 109-132.
LUPOVICI, A. Ontological dissonance, clashing identities, and Israel's unilateral steps towards the Palestinians. Review of International Studies, vol. 38, p. 809-833, 2012.
MEMORANDUM on Security Assurances in connection with Ukraine’s accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Budapest: [s.n.], 5 dez. 1994.
MITZEN, J. Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security dilemma. European Journal of International Relations, v. 12, n. 3, p. 341–370, set. 2006.
NAROZHNA, T. State–society complexes in ontological security-seeking in IR. Journal of International Relations and Development, v. 23, n. 3, p. 559–583, 23 set. 2020.
NAROZHNA, T. Revisiting the Causes of Russian Foreign Policy Changes Incoherent Biographical Narrative, Recognition and Russia’s Ontological Security-Seeking. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, vol. 15, n. 2, p. 56–81, 2021.
NESBITT-LARKING, P. The Ideological Work of Narratives. Political Psychology, vol. 38, n. 3, p. 571–578, p. 2017.
NOLL, A. How the Ukraine-Russia crisis reached a tipping point. DW. [S.l.: s.n], 22 fev. 2022. Disponível em: https://p.dw.com/p/477XW. Acesso em: 22 jun. 2022.
PUTIN, V. Russia at the Turn of the Millennium. [S.l.: s.n.], 31 dez. 1999.
PUTIN, V. Speech and the Following Discussion at the Munich Conference on Security Policy. Munich: [s.n.], 10 fev. 2007.
PUTIN, V. Russia and the changing world. Moscow: Valdai Club, 27 fev. 2012.
PUTIN, V. Address by President of Russia Federation. Moscow: [s.n.], 18 mar. 2014.
PUTIN, V. Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly. Moscow: [s.n.], 21 abr. 2021a.
PUTIN, V. On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians. Moscow: [s.n.], 12 jul. 2021b.
RAY, Michael. Ukraine crisis. Encyclopedia Britannica, [S.l.: s. n.], 26 maio 2017.
ROBERTS, K. Understanding Putin: The politics of identity and geopolitics in Russian foreign policy discourse. International Journal, v. 72, n. 1, p. 28–55, 16 mar. 2017.
RUMELILI, B. Identity and desecuritisation: The pitfalls of conflating ontological and physical security. Journal of Int Rel and Dev, v. 18, n. 1, p. 52–74, 2015.
RUMELILI, B. Breaking with Europe’s pasts: memory, reconciliation, and ontological (In)security. European Security, vol. 27, n. 3, p. 280-295, 2018.
RUMELILI, B.; ÇELIK, A. B. Ontological insecurity in asymmetric conflicts: Reflections on agonistic peace in Turkey’s Kurdish issue. Security Dialogue, p. 1-18, 2017.
RUSSIAN FEDERATION. National Security Concept. [S.l.: s.n], 10 jan. 2000.
RUSSIAN FEDERATION. The Foreign Policy Concept. [S.l.: s.n], 12 jan. 2008.
RUSSIAN FEDERATION. The Foreign Policy Concept. [S.l.: s.n], 18 fev. 2013.
RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Russian National Security Strategy. [S.l.: s.n], 31 dez. 2015.
RUSSIAN FEDERATION. The Foreign Policy Concept. [S.l.: s.n], 01 dez. 2016.
RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Strategy of National Security Strategy. [S.l.: s.n], 02 jul. 2021.
SASSE, G. The Crimea Question: Identity, Transition, and Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007.
SOARES, B. B. America First: Pensando enquadramentos discursivos da segurança ontológica na era Trump. (NUPRI Working Paper, 16, p. 1-12), 2022. São Paulo: Núcleo de Pesquisa em Relações Internacionais da Universidade de São Paulo (NUPRI). https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-81843-2
STEELE, B. J.; HOMOLAR, A. Ontological insecurities and the politics of contemporary populism. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, v. 32, n. 3, p. 214–221, 4 maio 2019.
STOICESCU, K. Dialogue with Russia - Russia Needs to Reset Relations with the West. Tallinn: International Centre for Defence and Security, jun. 2021.
SULLIVAN, B. Russia’s at war with Ukraine. Here’s how we got here. NPR. [S.l: s.n], 22.fev.2022. Disponível em: https://www.npr.org/2022/02/12/1080205477/history-ukraine-russia. Acesso em: 22 jun. 2022.
TOAL, G. Near abroad: Putin, the West and the contest over Ukraine and the Caucasus. [S.l.]: Oxford University Press, 2016.
UKRAINE. All-Ucranian populations census 2001. [S.l.]: State Statistics Committee of Ukraine, 2001.
UMLAND, A. Reshaping Ukraine’s Western Integration. Desk Russie, [S.l.: s.n], 06.jan.2022.
WALKER, N. Ukraine crisis: A timeline (2014-present). Commons Library Research Briefing n. CBP 9476. [S.l.]: House of Commons, 01 abr. 2022.
YOFFE, M. Crisis in Ukraine: What Happened and Why. In: GW LIBRARIES. Research Guides. Washington: George Washington University, 04 abr. 2022.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Estudos Internacionais: International Relations Journal of PUC Minas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a.Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
b.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).